<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nike+ iPod:  A Year in Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-154844</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-154844</guid>
		<description>I love this product, been using it for about 6 months now... 

I just recently had to get new shoes after 400 miles in my old Nikes wore off the treds... got another pair of Nikes, put the sensor in the new shoes only to find out that the mileage is way off... a mile is much longer than it used to be in my old shoes... these shoes are almost the same as the last shoes too... only I guess the tred is certainly much thicker since they are new, not sure if that effects calibration and if it does then my time and pace drop over the last 6 months are partly to getting in shape and partly due to the sensor getting closer to the pavement...  I have recalibrated and today it was still off... I recalibrated again and will test tomorrow... 

by the way, I decided to get in the car and check the mileage on the main route I run and I found that my old shoes were off by 5%... and the new shoes are off by 10%... so in terms of accuracy, my sensor thinks a mile is longer than it really is...  

not that it really matters for those staying in shape, you want the sensor to be consistent, but if you are training for races you really want the distance to be as accurate as possible... I have 3rd gen Nano which seems to have limited calibrating capabilities... still love this device though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this product, been using it for about 6 months now&#8230; </p>
<p>I just recently had to get new shoes after 400 miles in my old Nikes wore off the treds&#8230; got another pair of Nikes, put the sensor in the new shoes only to find out that the mileage is way off&#8230; a mile is much longer than it used to be in my old shoes&#8230; these shoes are almost the same as the last shoes too&#8230; only I guess the tred is certainly much thicker since they are new, not sure if that effects calibration and if it does then my time and pace drop over the last 6 months are partly to getting in shape and partly due to the sensor getting closer to the pavement&#8230;  I have recalibrated and today it was still off&#8230; I recalibrated again and will test tomorrow&#8230; </p>
<p>by the way, I decided to get in the car and check the mileage on the main route I run and I found that my old shoes were off by 5%&#8230; and the new shoes are off by 10%&#8230; so in terms of accuracy, my sensor thinks a mile is longer than it really is&#8230;  </p>
<p>not that it really matters for those staying in shape, you want the sensor to be consistent, but if you are training for races you really want the distance to be as accurate as possible&#8230; I have 3rd gen Nano which seems to have limited calibrating capabilities&#8230; still love this device though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-88096</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-88096</guid>
		<description>Cool to see that you&#039;re from Edmonton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool to see that you&#8217;re from Edmonton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-50804</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-50804</guid>
		<description>Very helpful with my research on Nike+! Thanks so much for your blog - I agree with the previous poster - Im surprised someone hasnt come up with a hack for the 5G ipods! I love my 5G with a passion, and I cannot workout without it. I have the Nike+ shoes and I was really excited to sync these two up, but then I found out it was only works with nanos. I agree with the idea behind it, dont promote running with the 5G for the poor hard drive, but what about people who strictly put their 5G on the work out machine, we arnt jumbling our ipods... or what about the people that run with it anyway? It seems like an odd marketing strategy to limit them to the nanos - offer it to all generations and they will make more sales! Especially for the ipods that end up breaking! I say just put out a disclaimer saying that its not reccomended to run with your 5G and let us all join in on the fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very helpful with my research on Nike+! Thanks so much for your blog &#8211; I agree with the previous poster &#8211; Im surprised someone hasnt come up with a hack for the 5G ipods! I love my 5G with a passion, and I cannot workout without it. I have the Nike+ shoes and I was really excited to sync these two up, but then I found out it was only works with nanos. I agree with the idea behind it, dont promote running with the 5G for the poor hard drive, but what about people who strictly put their 5G on the work out machine, we arnt jumbling our ipods&#8230; or what about the people that run with it anyway? It seems like an odd marketing strategy to limit them to the nanos &#8211; offer it to all generations and they will make more sales! Especially for the ipods that end up breaking! I say just put out a disclaimer saying that its not reccomended to run with your 5G and let us all join in on the fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-32443</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-32443</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tom&lt;/strong&gt;

Wow, nice blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom</strong></p>
<p>Wow, nice blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Londres</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-22638</link>
		<dc:creator>Londres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-22638</guid>
		<description>It is a real shame that the battery cannot be replaced, surely nike could have incorporated a &quot;watch battery&quot; which could have been very easily replaced. I am sure that we are going to see some way of doing this in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a real shame that the battery cannot be replaced, surely nike could have incorporated a &#8220;watch battery&#8221; which could have been very easily replaced. I am sure that we are going to see some way of doing this in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miscellaneous, etc. &#187; NikeMinus</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-18139</link>
		<dc:creator>Miscellaneous, etc. &#187; NikeMinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-18139</guid>
		<description>[...] you know,Â accurate.Â  Quickly Google any givenÂ (and for journalistic balance, here&#8217;s this) link about the product, and you&#8217;ll see what I mean.Â  There&#8217;s all kinds of advice on what to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you know,Â accurate.Â  Quickly Google any givenÂ (and for journalistic balance, here&#8217;s this) link about the product, and you&#8217;ll see what I mean.Â  There&#8217;s all kinds of advice on what to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-7171</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 05:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-7171</guid>
		<description>@ runner 
It&#039;s interesting that Nike+ just doesn&#039;t seem accurate for some people... lots of runners I know, myself included, find it extremely accurate. I&#039;ve been so impressed by the Nike+ performance, in fact, I&#039;m almost convinced there might just be something wrong with the Nike+ sensors (the accelerometer?) of those experiencing inaccuracy... but that&#039;s just a hunch. 

I think though I would disagree whole-heartedly with the rumors that Nike+ is not as accurate for women. I&#039;ve met a few members of the Apple team that created the Nike+ and associated software. One in particular, a woman, told me about the countless (probably hundreds of) hours she spent running and walking around Infinite Loop to get the algorithm perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ runner<br />
It&#8217;s interesting that Nike+ just doesn&#8217;t seem accurate for some people&#8230; lots of runners I know, myself included, find it extremely accurate. I&#8217;ve been so impressed by the Nike+ performance, in fact, I&#8217;m almost convinced there might just be something wrong with the Nike+ sensors (the accelerometer?) of those experiencing inaccuracy&#8230; but that&#8217;s just a hunch. </p>
<p>I think though I would disagree whole-heartedly with the rumors that Nike+ is not as accurate for women. I&#8217;ve met a few members of the Apple team that created the Nike+ and associated software. One in particular, a woman, told me about the countless (probably hundreds of) hours she spent running and walking around Infinite Loop to get the algorithm perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runner</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6750</link>
		<dc:creator>runner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-6750</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve calibrated the sensor several times and have not found it to be accurate at all. I think that if you were running the same route each time then it would be accurate. The problem is that I&#039;m training for long-distance races so my routes and speed vary considerably. If I run at the pace I calibrated the sensor at, it&#039;s accurate. If I run slower or faster it&#039;s as much at 10% off. As a result, I&#039;ve stopped using it.

I&#039;ve also heard that this type of technology doesn&#039;t work as well for women because our running gait is slightly different because of our wider hips. Is there any validity to this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve calibrated the sensor several times and have not found it to be accurate at all. I think that if you were running the same route each time then it would be accurate. The problem is that I&#8217;m training for long-distance races so my routes and speed vary considerably. If I run at the pace I calibrated the sensor at, it&#8217;s accurate. If I run slower or faster it&#8217;s as much at 10% off. As a result, I&#8217;ve stopped using it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also heard that this type of technology doesn&#8217;t work as well for women because our running gait is slightly different because of our wider hips. Is there any validity to this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flib juckson</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5293</link>
		<dc:creator>flib juckson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 21:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-5293</guid>
		<description>the only ipod that i&#039;d run with would be a 2nd gen shuffle.  otherwise, plastic meets pavement..not cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only ipod that i&#8217;d run with would be a 2nd gen shuffle.  otherwise, plastic meets pavement..not cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5216</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 23:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-5216</guid>
		<description>Great article, Tyler!  You&#039;re right, this is a very exciting product and it&#039;s still in its infancy. There&#039;s a lot more to come.  I linked to your article from my blog at RUNNER+ http://www.runnerplus.com/blog/2007/05/nike-ipod-celebrates-one-year-together.asp -- please check it out. I&#039;d love to have you involved with our beta program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Tyler!  You&#8217;re right, this is a very exciting product and it&#8217;s still in its infancy. There&#8217;s a lot more to come.  I linked to your article from my blog at RUNNER+ <a href="http://www.runnerplus.com/blog/2007/05/nike-ipod-celebrates-one-year-together.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.runnerplus.com/blog/2007/05/nike-ipod-celebrates-one-year-together.asp</a> &#8212; please check it out. I&#8217;d love to have you involved with our beta program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newswede</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5187</link>
		<dc:creator>newswede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-5187</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply Tyler. 
Yes, I know about the issues but was willing to try anyway. To be honest I don&#039;t really run but I walk a LOT. I thought it would be good as a visual guide as to how much. Plus, I keep a pretty good pace. 

I do think the 5th gen iPods are a bit more fragile than the older ones. I just sold my 3rd gen which I had since 2003. I put that thing through a real workout and never had a problem. It was used for music and a massive amout of file sharing between my office &amp; home (big movie and photoshop files). I couldn&#039;t have been more pleased. Hopefully I get the same life out of this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply Tyler.<br />
Yes, I know about the issues but was willing to try anyway. To be honest I don&#8217;t really run but I walk a LOT. I thought it would be good as a visual guide as to how much. Plus, I keep a pretty good pace. </p>
<p>I do think the 5th gen iPods are a bit more fragile than the older ones. I just sold my 3rd gen which I had since 2003. I put that thing through a real workout and never had a problem. It was used for music and a massive amout of file sharing between my office &amp; home (big movie and photoshop files). I couldn&#8217;t have been more pleased. Hopefully I get the same life out of this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5185</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-5185</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.  I have been using the Nike+ for a month and think it is great.  The Sportsuit Relay by Marware is a very good case for the sensor and ipod.  Also, there is a new website in beta right now called runnerplus.com that is adding a ton of features not on the nikeplus site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.  I have been using the Nike+ for a month and think it is great.  The Sportsuit Relay by Marware is a very good case for the sensor and ipod.  Also, there is a new website in beta right now called runnerplus.com that is adding a ton of features not on the nikeplus site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5184</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-5184</guid>
		<description>@Adam
No problem, the Marware pouch is really nice - and cheap too.

@Newswede
I really think you&#039;d regret running with your iPod 5G eventually. Of the people I know who have run with their hard drive based iPods many have had their iPod die on them prematurely. Sometimes the iPod dies from being dropped but very often the HD just dies mysteriously. After-all, it&#039;s pretty tough on a HD to search for data while being swung around every which way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam<br />
No problem, the Marware pouch is really nice &#8211; and cheap too.</p>
<p>@Newswede<br />
I really think you&#8217;d regret running with your iPod 5G eventually. Of the people I know who have run with their hard drive based iPods many have had their iPod die on them prematurely. Sometimes the iPod dies from being dropped but very often the HD just dies mysteriously. After-all, it&#8217;s pretty tough on a HD to search for data while being swung around every which way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Carmody</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5178</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Carmody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-5178</guid>
		<description>Whoops, I didn&#039;t notice that you&#039;d mentioned Marware in the post, sorry Tyler :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, I didn&#8217;t notice that you&#8217;d mentioned Marware in the post, sorry Tyler <img src='http://macapper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newswede</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5174</link>
		<dc:creator>newswede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-5174</guid>
		<description>I still can&#039;t believe that nobody has made a hack to use this item with a 5G video iPod. I&#039;d buy one in a second!

If anyone hears of one PLEASE let me know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t believe that nobody has made a hack to use this item with a 5G video iPod. I&#8217;d buy one in a second!</p>
<p>If anyone hears of one PLEASE let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Carmody</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5169</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Carmody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-5169</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re not into Nike I&#039;ve found that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marware.com/Sportsuit-Sensor-for-Gen-2-iPod-nano&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Marware&lt;/a&gt; makes a nice product that will let you use the sensor with any pair of running shoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not into Nike I&#8217;ve found that <a href="http://www.marware.com/Sportsuit-Sensor-for-Gen-2-iPod-nano" rel="nofollow"> Marware</a> makes a nice product that will let you use the sensor with any pair of running shoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5165</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/23/nike-ipod-a-year-in-review/#comment-5165</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the quality information. As an avid runner, I have been wanting to get this kit for a while. After reading this detailed post, you sold me. I am going to get one this weekend. I have not had the problems with the Nike sneakers however, I guess I am fortunate to have common &quot;feet&quot; specs.

Darren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quality information. As an avid runner, I have been wanting to get this kit for a while. After reading this detailed post, you sold me. I am going to get one this weekend. I have not had the problems with the Nike sneakers however, I guess I am fortunate to have common &#8220;feet&#8221; specs.</p>
<p>Darren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
