<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iusethis: Digg for Mac Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-5664</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/#comment-5664</guid>
		<description>iusethis.com is obscure?  I don&#039;t think so.

No, I&#039;m not affiliated with them what-so-ever.  But I&#039;ve read about the site on many, many blogs and it has been referenced by many commercial sites as well.

iusethis is improving by leaps and bounds almost weekly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iusethis.com is obscure?  I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m not affiliated with them what-so-ever.  But I&#8217;ve read about the site on many, many blogs and it has been referenced by many commercial sites as well.</p>
<p>iusethis is improving by leaps and bounds almost weekly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teemoru</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-5575</link>
		<dc:creator>Teemoru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/#comment-5575</guid>
		<description>Iusethis is especially useful when doing a full reinstall. You can quickly download all the apps you were using. Iusethis Iusethis :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iusethis is especially useful when doing a full reinstall. You can quickly download all the apps you were using. Iusethis Iusethis <img src='http://macapper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conner Downey</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-5551</link>
		<dc:creator>Conner Downey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 11:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/#comment-5551</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but from the looks of it there, they seem less known. I knew about awaken and alarm clock pro, but found out about irooster and aurora later.

Anyway, thanks for stopping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but from the looks of it there, they seem less known. I knew about awaken and alarm clock pro, but found out about irooster and aurora later.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for stopping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brethorst</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-5541</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brethorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 06:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/#comment-5541</guid>
		<description>You know that Alarm Clock Pro and iRooster both predate Aurora and Awaken, right?

Cheers,
Aaron
author of iRooster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know that Alarm Clock Pro and iRooster both predate Aurora and Awaken, right?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Aaron<br />
author of iRooster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herkamer Roenski</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-5473</link>
		<dc:creator>Herkamer Roenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 17:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/#comment-5473</guid>
		<description>I absolutely love iusethis. It works great, supports openid, and it&#039;s gaining more and more users. The personalized RSS feeds work great for app updates. It&#039;s really a wonder how Web 2.0 happens when there are people like Jim around....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely love iusethis. It works great, supports openid, and it&#8217;s gaining more and more users. The personalized RSS feeds work great for app updates. It&#8217;s really a wonder how Web 2.0 happens when there are people like Jim around&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-5464</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/05/27/iusethis-digg-for-mac-applications/#comment-5464</guid>
		<description>I truly hope you got payed to write this article. I mean really. iUseThis is such an obscure site that this is the first time I&#039;ve seen it mentioned ANYWHERE outside their own domain. It&#039;s used so little that 260 votes is obscenely high in the 2 to 10 vote norm.

I have no problem with the idea, or the people who run it. But this site is absolutely useless for finding small, relatively unknown apps because the only things listed are the more popular apps that can easily be seen at VT, MU, Softpedia and dozens of other sites.

I like this idea of users voting for the apps, rather than download count deciding what is popular (how many times have you downloaded an app and tossed it after one use). 

Perhaps some kind of cross marketing or sponsorships with other popular sites can bring this site some much deserved publicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I truly hope you got payed to write this article. I mean really. iUseThis is such an obscure site that this is the first time I&#8217;ve seen it mentioned ANYWHERE outside their own domain. It&#8217;s used so little that 260 votes is obscenely high in the 2 to 10 vote norm.</p>
<p>I have no problem with the idea, or the people who run it. But this site is absolutely useless for finding small, relatively unknown apps because the only things listed are the more popular apps that can easily be seen at VT, MU, Softpedia and dozens of other sites.</p>
<p>I like this idea of users voting for the apps, rather than download count deciding what is popular (how many times have you downloaded an app and tossed it after one use). </p>
<p>Perhaps some kind of cross marketing or sponsorships with other popular sites can bring this site some much deserved publicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
