<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Stacks Competition for Overflow?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/comment-page-1/#comment-10955</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/#comment-10955</guid>
		<description>Stacks aren&#039;t one-dimensional. I presonally find no reason whatsoever to use overflow now that I use leopard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacks aren&#8217;t one-dimensional. I presonally find no reason whatsoever to use overflow now that I use leopard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overflow Winners Announced &#124; MacApper</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/comment-page-1/#comment-10925</link>
		<dc:creator>Overflow Winners Announced &#124; MacApper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/#comment-10925</guid>
		<description>[...] Although we still think it&#8217;s a great app, Overflow has been said to have become somewhat obsolete with the introduction of Stacks in Leopard, so make sure you read our post from yesterday Is Stacks competition for Overflow? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Although we still think it&#8217;s a great app, Overflow has been said to have become somewhat obsolete with the introduction of Stacks in Leopard, so make sure you read our post from yesterday Is Stacks competition for Overflow? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yichen Zhang</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/comment-page-1/#comment-10878</link>
		<dc:creator>Yichen Zhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/#comment-10878</guid>
		<description>I am a registered Overflow user, and I just deleted it when I saw stacks and wait for leopard.

Stacks is cool and easy to use. I don&#039;t really need so many categories or other features. Quicksilver does the job. For this kind of application, i only need it to be cool cool cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a registered Overflow user, and I just deleted it when I saw stacks and wait for leopard.</p>
<p>Stacks is cool and easy to use. I don&#8217;t really need so many categories or other features. Quicksilver does the job. For this kind of application, i only need it to be cool cool cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XScout</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/comment-page-1/#comment-10874</link>
		<dc:creator>XScout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/#comment-10874</guid>
		<description>My favorite app launcher has always been finder. Grouping applications in sub folders. But getting more and more small and big useful apps makes finding the app I am looking for slower and slower. 

I tried different app launchers but non did really work for me. I need to see icons, I am visual person. Most launchers use text or have only very rudimentary icon support. Ready the review I gave it a try

Awesome this is just a 2D tabed dock I was looking for. Finally a application that is really handy in organizing applications. Think it doesn&#039;t really compete with stacks from Leopard they are still one dimensional and can only hold this many items, while OverFlow can hold much much items without getting overfilled.

Pops up from it&#039;s dock item that&#039;s the way it should be. Cause the dock is and always will stay a central starting point on your mac for starting things. So that&#039;s a really good ad intuitive choice

Categories feature really sets this app apart from apps like ToDos.  And will make this app that will stick. Test driven it and it&#039;s really intuitive and sleek.

At first the price looks a bit steap, but The app is well thought. It&#039;s highly customizable, Like sizing icons, text spacing and color and last but not least very intuitive for the user. That makes it well worth the $15,-

Only thing I miss is a option to put a icon in front of every category and  a set of sleek Icons to be used for the categories. That will really make it totally visual and even more productive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite app launcher has always been finder. Grouping applications in sub folders. But getting more and more small and big useful apps makes finding the app I am looking for slower and slower. </p>
<p>I tried different app launchers but non did really work for me. I need to see icons, I am visual person. Most launchers use text or have only very rudimentary icon support. Ready the review I gave it a try</p>
<p>Awesome this is just a 2D tabed dock I was looking for. Finally a application that is really handy in organizing applications. Think it doesn&#8217;t really compete with stacks from Leopard they are still one dimensional and can only hold this many items, while OverFlow can hold much much items without getting overfilled.</p>
<p>Pops up from it&#8217;s dock item that&#8217;s the way it should be. Cause the dock is and always will stay a central starting point on your mac for starting things. So that&#8217;s a really good ad intuitive choice</p>
<p>Categories feature really sets this app apart from apps like ToDos.  And will make this app that will stick. Test driven it and it&#8217;s really intuitive and sleek.</p>
<p>At first the price looks a bit steap, but The app is well thought. It&#8217;s highly customizable, Like sizing icons, text spacing and color and last but not least very intuitive for the user. That makes it well worth the $15,-</p>
<p>Only thing I miss is a option to put a icon in front of every category and  a set of sleek Icons to be used for the categories. That will really make it totally visual and even more productive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techslacker</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/comment-page-1/#comment-10865</link>
		<dc:creator>Techslacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/08/10/is-stacks-competition-for-overflow/#comment-10865</guid>
		<description>Overflow is overrated.  Sure, it&#039;s useful to some but certainly, to me, not worth being labeled as shareware.  I welcome stacks.  It&#039;s something that should have been there from the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overflow is overrated.  Sure, it&#8217;s useful to some but certainly, to me, not worth being labeled as shareware.  I welcome stacks.  It&#8217;s something that should have been there from the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
