<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1,600 in Software!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: end restaurant jobs</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-152230</link>
		<dc:creator>end restaurant jobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-152230</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;end restaurant jobs...&lt;/strong&gt;

â€œ Everything was created by an all- powerful and all- knowing being who exists outside of space and time. This being impregnated a human woman through non- physical means and was born as her offspring. Within space and time, the being was executed as...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>end restaurant jobs&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>â€œ Everything was created by an all- powerful and all- knowing being who exists outside of space and time. This being impregnated a human woman through non- physical means and was born as her offspring. Within space and time, the being was executed as&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amin</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-117032</link>
		<dc:creator>amin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-117032</guid>
		<description>i disagree with adium. I tried adding my yahoo messenger account and it kept telling me something about a japanese username?? wtf? 

anyhow, you forgot mactheripper, burn, little snitch, neooffice (more for mac), caffeine, appzapper (not free but great app), cog, come on man!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i disagree with adium. I tried adding my yahoo messenger account and it kept telling me something about a japanese username?? wtf? </p>
<p>anyhow, you forgot mactheripper, burn, little snitch, neooffice (more for mac), caffeine, appzapper (not free but great app), cog, come on man!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adobe creative suite</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-77933</link>
		<dc:creator>adobe creative suite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-77933</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alarm clock cd player</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-41715</link>
		<dc:creator>alarm clock cd player</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-41715</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alarm clock cd player&lt;/strong&gt;

They come in different styles and features. Some of the best alarm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alarm clock cd player</strong></p>
<p>They come in different styles and features. Some of the best alarm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Mac OS X Freeware List &#124; MacApper</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-38689</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Mac OS X Freeware List &#124; MacApper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-38689</guid>
		<description>[...] and 4, OGG Vorbis, DivX and much more, VLC will play it. This really is a must so just get it now. Our Review &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and 4, OGG Vorbis, DivX and much more, VLC will play it. This really is a must so just get it now. Our Review | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greg</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-18101</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-18101</guid>
		<description>@Rocket - I think youve got that a bit wrong. If you look at the list most commenters have said something like &quot;nice list&quot; or &quot;great list&quot; and then pointed out a product that they prefer.
There were some posts that dont fit into that category (of course) but I think most did.
Also, most were not pointing out products that cost money that beat the free equivalent. For example: A lot of people seem to prefer Camino (me included) over Firefox, which is also free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rocket &#8211; I think youve got that a bit wrong. If you look at the list most commenters have said something like &#8220;nice list&#8221; or &#8220;great list&#8221; and then pointed out a product that they prefer.<br />
There were some posts that dont fit into that category (of course) but I think most did.<br />
Also, most were not pointing out products that cost money that beat the free equivalent. For example: A lot of people seem to prefer Camino (me included) over Firefox, which is also free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocket</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-18081</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-18081</guid>
		<description>Andrew, I can see you are dealing with the vast majority of people who feel that it is necessary to ignore the main topic of your post &quot;Free vs BUY&quot; software for the new mac user and always find a way to become the &quot;expert&quot; of software they &quot;prefer&quot; and wage a war of whats best. 

Even though most of your commenters here think this is a software war or comparison of software features, I think I am one of two or 3 people who read this article understand it is only about &quot;free&quot; or insanely cheap software for the new mac user and nothing more. This is a very good list of free software programs that simply work for zero cash out of pocket. 

For the rest of the apparently uneducated commenter, free does not mean &quot;best&quot; nor does it imply &quot;best for everyone&quot;, it simply means it works, and its free. I think Andrew you knew this and expected your readership to understand this as well, but alas.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, I can see you are dealing with the vast majority of people who feel that it is necessary to ignore the main topic of your post &#8220;Free vs BUY&#8221; software for the new mac user and always find a way to become the &#8220;expert&#8221; of software they &#8220;prefer&#8221; and wage a war of whats best. </p>
<p>Even though most of your commenters here think this is a software war or comparison of software features, I think I am one of two or 3 people who read this article understand it is only about &#8220;free&#8221; or insanely cheap software for the new mac user and nothing more. This is a very good list of free software programs that simply work for zero cash out of pocket. </p>
<p>For the rest of the apparently uneducated commenter, free does not mean &#8220;best&#8221; nor does it imply &#8220;best for everyone&#8221;, it simply means it works, and its free. I think Andrew you knew this and expected your readership to understand this as well, but alas&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ð‘Ð»Ð¾Ð³ Ð¾ Ð´Ð¸Ð·Ð°Ð¹Ð½Ðµ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ð¡Ð¾Ñ„Ñ‚ Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¼Ð°ÐºÐ°. Ð­ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸Ð¼ 1000$</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17992</link>
		<dc:creator>Ð‘Ð»Ð¾Ð³ Ð¾ Ð´Ð¸Ð·Ð°Ð¹Ð½Ðµ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ð¡Ð¾Ñ„Ñ‚ Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¼Ð°ÐºÐ°. Ð­ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸Ð¼ 1000$</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17992</guid>
		<description>[...] Ð±Ð»Ð¾Ð³ MacApper (Ð²ÑÐµ Ð¾ Ð¼Ð°ÐºÐµ) ÑÐ¾ÑÑ‚Ð°Ð²Ð¸Ð» ÑÐ¿Ð¸ÑÐ¾Ðº Ð¸Ð· Ð±ÐµÑÐ¿Ð»Ð°Ñ‚Ð½Ñ‹Ñ… Ð°Ð»ÑŒÑ‚ÐµÑ€Ð½Ð°Ñ‚Ð¸Ð² [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ð±Ð»Ð¾Ð³ MacApper (Ð²ÑÐµ Ð¾ Ð¼Ð°ÐºÐµ) ÑÐ¾ÑÑ‚Ð°Ð²Ð¸Ð» ÑÐ¿Ð¸ÑÐ¾Ðº Ð¸Ð· Ð±ÐµÑÐ¿Ð»Ð°Ñ‚Ð½Ñ‹Ñ… Ð°Ð»ÑŒÑ‚ÐµÑ€Ð½Ð°Ñ‚Ð¸Ð² [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-10-12 &#124; blog.ftofani.com // blog de felipe tofani</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17858</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-10-12 &#124; blog.ftofani.com // blog de felipe tofani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17858</guid>
		<description>[...] Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1,600 in Software! &#124; MacApper (tags: mac software osx Apple reference) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1,600 in Software! | MacApper (tags: mac software osx Apple reference) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-10-12 &#124; pristina.org &#124; everything design</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17793</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-10-12 &#124; pristina.org &#124; everything design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17793</guid>
		<description>[...] Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1,600 in Software! &#124; MacApper (tags: mac software osx Apple reference)     Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1,600 in Software! | MacApper (tags: mac software osx Apple reference)     Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ð‘ÐµÑÐ¿Ð»Ð°Ñ‚Ð½Ñ‹Ð¹ ÑÐ¾Ñ„Ñ‚ Ð´Ð»Ñ Mac, Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ ÐºÐ°Ðº ÑÐ±ÐµÑ€ÐµÑ‡ÑŒ 1000 Ð´Ð¾Ð»Ð»Ð°Ñ€Ð¾Ð² &#8212; MacRadar</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17773</link>
		<dc:creator>Ð‘ÐµÑÐ¿Ð»Ð°Ñ‚Ð½Ñ‹Ð¹ ÑÐ¾Ñ„Ñ‚ Ð´Ð»Ñ Mac, Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ ÐºÐ°Ðº ÑÐ±ÐµÑ€ÐµÑ‡ÑŒ 1000 Ð´Ð¾Ð»Ð»Ð°Ñ€Ð¾Ð² &#8212; MacRadar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17773</guid>
		<description>[...] Ð±Ð»Ð¾Ð³ MacApper ÑÐ¾ÑÑ‚Ð°Ð²Ð¸Ð» Ð¾Ñ‚Ð»Ð¸Ñ‡Ð½Ñ‹Ð¹ ÑÐ¿Ð¸ÑÐ¾Ðº Ð¸Ð· Ð±ÐµÑÐ¿Ð»Ð°Ñ‚Ð½Ñ‹Ñ… Ð°Ð»ÑŒÑ‚ÐµÑ€Ð½Ð°Ñ‚Ð¸Ð² [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ð±Ð»Ð¾Ð³ MacApper ÑÐ¾ÑÑ‚Ð°Ð²Ð¸Ð» Ð¾Ñ‚Ð»Ð¸Ñ‡Ð½Ñ‹Ð¹ ÑÐ¿Ð¸ÑÐ¾Ðº Ð¸Ð· Ð±ÐµÑÐ¿Ð»Ð°Ñ‚Ð½Ñ‹Ñ… Ð°Ð»ÑŒÑ‚ÐµÑ€Ð½Ð°Ñ‚Ð¸Ð² [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byte Into It 10 Oct 07 &#171; Byte Into It - Computing and new technology</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17579</link>
		<dc:creator>Byte Into It 10 Oct 07 &#171; Byte Into It - Computing and new technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17579</guid>
		<description>[...] Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1,600 in Software! &#124; MacApper   The following software is 100% free and tried and proven with excellent results. Besides, if it doesnâ€™t work for you, it didnâ€™t cost you anything to start with. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1,600 in Software! | MacApper   The following software is 100% free and tried and proven with excellent results. Besides, if it doesnâ€™t work for you, it didnâ€™t cost you anything to start with. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insomnic</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17336</link>
		<dc:creator>Insomnic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17336</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to kick up my support for a few of the comments here.  Camino for browser (really good spot between Firefox and Safari) and Mail for email. I also agree that UnArchiver is best for handling archive extractions.

VLC always felt a little run down to me.  I always liked MPlayer and recently have been sticking to using Perian Codec with either Quicktime (now that it has fullscreen for free) or Niceplayer. Perian really made a huge difference for me because it allowed all those file formats not to just be playable, but usable in iMovie and other &quot;Quicktime based&quot; applications.

This is a decent list and I can understand including Firefox, Open Office and Thunderbird as they will be familiar to many geek converts which will make the transition easier. I&#039;ve found for regular computer users (ones that just want to get online and check email and write up a few docs), most of the built in apps work best for them due to the &quot;just works&quot; factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to kick up my support for a few of the comments here.  Camino for browser (really good spot between Firefox and Safari) and Mail for email. I also agree that UnArchiver is best for handling archive extractions.</p>
<p>VLC always felt a little run down to me.  I always liked MPlayer and recently have been sticking to using Perian Codec with either Quicktime (now that it has fullscreen for free) or Niceplayer. Perian really made a huge difference for me because it allowed all those file formats not to just be playable, but usable in iMovie and other &#8220;Quicktime based&#8221; applications.</p>
<p>This is a decent list and I can understand including Firefox, Open Office and Thunderbird as they will be familiar to many geek converts which will make the transition easier. I&#8217;ve found for regular computer users (ones that just want to get online and check email and write up a few docs), most of the built in apps work best for them due to the &#8220;just works&#8221; factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.allcosmeticsadvice.info &#187; Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1600 in Software!</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17231</link>
		<dc:creator>www.allcosmeticsadvice.info &#187; Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1600 in Software!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17231</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrew Brigmond wrote a fantastic post today on &#8220;Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1600 in Software!&#8221;Here&#8217;s ONLY a quick extractUnRarX provides a very efficient Mac based extractor. I generally find it to be faster than itâ€™s Windows WinRAR counterpart. You wonâ€™t be able to make any .rar archives with this software, but you can certainly open them. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andrew Brigmond wrote a fantastic post today on &#8220;Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1600 in Software!&#8221;Here&#8217;s ONLY a quick extractUnRarX provides a very efficient Mac based extractor. I generally find it to be faster than itâ€™s Windows WinRAR counterpart. You wonâ€™t be able to make any .rar archives with this software, but you can certainly open them. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computers &#187; Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1,600 in Software!</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17212</link>
		<dc:creator>Computers &#187; Mac Freeware: Save Up to $1,600 in Software!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17212</guid>
		<description>[...] LoveXploring the World with Love wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt on your computer, however this is included on your OS X discs if it s not already preinstalled [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LoveXploring the World with Love wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt on your computer, however this is included on your OS X discs if it s not already preinstalled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Brigmond</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17193</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Brigmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 12:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17193</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who remembers when QuickTime used to charge for the ability to run video in full screen mode? I know I bought it...I also get about 20 spam emails a day trying to tell sell my DVD ripping software for my Mac. Also Norton anti-virus is still very much in business and selling their wares for $49.95 a pop to defend your mac against threats that don&#039;t even exist...

Again, the premise of this write up is a short list to give new users switching to the mac platform from the PC world a quick list of software that will help them ease into their new digs without them having to spend a dime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who remembers when QuickTime used to charge for the ability to run video in full screen mode? I know I bought it&#8230;I also get about 20 spam emails a day trying to tell sell my DVD ripping software for my Mac. Also Norton anti-virus is still very much in business and selling their wares for $49.95 a pop to defend your mac against threats that don&#8217;t even exist&#8230;</p>
<p>Again, the premise of this write up is a short list to give new users switching to the mac platform from the PC world a quick list of software that will help them ease into their new digs without them having to spend a dime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yong Hwee</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17181</link>
		<dc:creator>Yong Hwee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 10:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17181</guid>
		<description>I do like Firefox for it&#039;s plugins but it has been acting strange after the 2.0 update.

As for FTP, I think Coda is great for web developers in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like Firefox for it&#8217;s plugins but it has been acting strange after the 2.0 update.</p>
<p>As for FTP, I think Coda is great for web developers in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17146</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 06:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17146</guid>
		<description>Font Book, it&#039;s sitting in your Applications folder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Font Book, it&#8217;s sitting in your Applications folder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMD</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17143</link>
		<dc:creator>DMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 05:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17143</guid>
		<description>Transmit tends to drop connections while Cyberduck will keep them alive. I use Cyberduck whenever I need to upload files larger than a few megabytes. I use both and now that Transmit finally has &quot;Open url/copy url&quot;, I find myself happier with it.

This is a nice list, but if you want to find a comprehensive list of all apps for a particular category, you should go to http://www.pure-mac.com

If you&#039;re looking for all open source and freeware apps go to http://www.freemacware.com/

And finally, if you want to read some irritating columnists, go here: http://mac360.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transmit tends to drop connections while Cyberduck will keep them alive. I use Cyberduck whenever I need to upload files larger than a few megabytes. I use both and now that Transmit finally has &#8220;Open url/copy url&#8221;, I find myself happier with it.</p>
<p>This is a nice list, but if you want to find a comprehensive list of all apps for a particular category, you should go to <a href="http://www.pure-mac.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pure-mac.com</a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking for all open source and freeware apps go to <a href="http://www.freemacware.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.freemacware.com/</a></p>
<p>And finally, if you want to read some irritating columnists, go here: <a href="http://mac360.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mac360.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17140</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 04:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17140</guid>
		<description>The premise of this article is very weak. It makes little sense, some of the programs are stupid and where do you get $50 of savings on a mail client from? You made it up didn&#039;t you. 

Who pays for a media player, DVD ripping software, bit torrent software or even anti-virus on a mac?

At a loss for content are we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The premise of this article is very weak. It makes little sense, some of the programs are stupid and where do you get $50 of savings on a mail client from? You made it up didn&#8217;t you. </p>
<p>Who pays for a media player, DVD ripping software, bit torrent software or even anti-virus on a mac?</p>
<p>At a loss for content are we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17119</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17119</guid>
		<description>Wow, I can&#039;t believe some of the things in this list.

1)  Firefox is EASILY the 4th best browser.  It&#039;s behind 3 others that are free...Omniweb (&#039;buy me&#039; nag window), Camino, and Safari
2) Thunderbird isn&#039;t as good as Mail.  Not even close.  Where does the $50 savings come from?
3) Cyberduck has NEVER been good.  I would rather pay for Transmit than get use this free client.
12) .rar?  Please.  Even if you use the .rar format, Unarchiver is much better than UnRarX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I can&#8217;t believe some of the things in this list.</p>
<p>1)  Firefox is EASILY the 4th best browser.  It&#8217;s behind 3 others that are free&#8230;Omniweb (&#8217;buy me&#8217; nag window), Camino, and Safari<br />
2) Thunderbird isn&#8217;t as good as Mail.  Not even close.  Where does the $50 savings come from?<br />
3) Cyberduck has NEVER been good.  I would rather pay for Transmit than get use this free client.<br />
12) .rar?  Please.  Even if you use the .rar format, Unarchiver is much better than UnRarX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Brigmond</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17070</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Brigmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17070</guid>
		<description>I will agree that Cyberduck as of about 8 months ago or so was actually quite terrible. But here in the past few months I feel they&#039;ve really changed a lot and made it a great product.

Firefox theme&#039;s truly are based on personal taste, or lack there of. I prefer the base Firefox theme, however, I know far too many people who completely love some of the most hideous themes known to mankind. But to them, they&#039;re visually appealing...appalling to the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will agree that Cyberduck as of about 8 months ago or so was actually quite terrible. But here in the past few months I feel they&#8217;ve really changed a lot and made it a great product.</p>
<p>Firefox theme&#8217;s truly are based on personal taste, or lack there of. I prefer the base Firefox theme, however, I know far too many people who completely love some of the most hideous themes known to mankind. But to them, they&#8217;re visually appealing&#8230;appalling to the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: visualize27</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17069</link>
		<dc:creator>visualize27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17069</guid>
		<description>The article claims(in regards to Firefox): &quot;..thousands of visually appealing themes&quot;

I would like to correct that with this: &quot;thousands of appalling themes&quot;

The statement above is purely my opinion. But, if you look you&#039;ll only find that Aronnax&#039;s themes and a few others available at Firefox&#039;s theme repository is visually appealing. There&#039;s Netscape&#039;s and that 20% more-pinstripe theme(somewhere online) . I&#039;ve looked through alot of the themes available on the official Firefox themepage and there aren&#039;t thousands of themes that works fullt on the Mac. And those that claim to work, well.. leave them be. They have either WindowsXP foldericons in the bookmarksmenu or other things wrong with them that simply does not match the OS X experience. 

The Firefox team should have left OS X alone or built Firefox from the ground up for OS X.

Your mileage may vary of course. I&#039;m just saying. You&#039;re better off with Camino as your regular Mozilla browser than Firefox if you can live without the Extension feature. Plus, Camino has better themes available for it, IMO.

The only thing I use VLC for these days are movies that has subtitles for them. Some doesn&#039;t always work with QuickTime. I use Perian &amp; Flip4Mac with QuickTime and it works beautifully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article claims(in regards to Firefox): &#8220;..thousands of visually appealing themes&#8221;</p>
<p>I would like to correct that with this: &#8220;thousands of appalling themes&#8221;</p>
<p>The statement above is purely my opinion. But, if you look you&#8217;ll only find that Aronnax&#8217;s themes and a few others available at Firefox&#8217;s theme repository is visually appealing. There&#8217;s Netscape&#8217;s and that 20% more-pinstripe theme(somewhere online) . I&#8217;ve looked through alot of the themes available on the official Firefox themepage and there aren&#8217;t thousands of themes that works fullt on the Mac. And those that claim to work, well.. leave them be. They have either WindowsXP foldericons in the bookmarksmenu or other things wrong with them that simply does not match the OS X experience. </p>
<p>The Firefox team should have left OS X alone or built Firefox from the ground up for OS X.</p>
<p>Your mileage may vary of course. I&#8217;m just saying. You&#8217;re better off with Camino as your regular Mozilla browser than Firefox if you can live without the Extension feature. Plus, Camino has better themes available for it, IMO.</p>
<p>The only thing I use VLC for these days are movies that has subtitles for them. Some doesn&#8217;t always work with QuickTime. I use Perian &amp; Flip4Mac with QuickTime and it works beautifully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greg</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17068</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17068</guid>
		<description>I thought Cyberduck was horrible personally. Tried it for a bit and just couldnt stand it. While its fair enough to have a free ftp client, it does its job well - there is no way, in my mind, that it beats Transmit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Cyberduck was horrible personally. Tried it for a bit and just couldnt stand it. While its fair enough to have a free ftp client, it does its job well &#8211; there is no way, in my mind, that it beats Transmit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Brigmond</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17066</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Brigmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17066</guid>
		<description>While I agree that Firefox vs Safari is a personal issue, but then again so is using TextEdit vs Microsoft Word. It all boils down to taste and what you plan to do with it, this list is merely a collection of great software that even the homeless can afford.

While Mail is a nice app, I would hardly consider it &quot;full-feature&quot;, not when compared to Thunderbird or Entourage. Mail is leaner most definitely, but on an enterprise level Mail is not going to be your solution.

I do strongly agree with CyberDuck being a better client, especially since Transmit weights in at $29.95 more then we want to spend. Managing an IT department and outfitting hundreds of computers, that&#039;s an instant savings of over $2,400 with a volume license. To any employers eyes, that&#039;s better.

As for VLC, I do believe the first point made is it&#039;s ability to play virtually any file. Not to mention interlacing and post processing.

David, thanks for the NeoOffice tip, I&#039;ll have to look into it as I&#039;m not the largest fan of the OpenOffice build.

In the end whatever works best for you is best, we&#039;re just bringing valid options to the table. I personally use Microsoft Office, CS3, Apple Remote Desktop and a huge list of other pricey software because they&#039;re better. But if you don&#039;t have the money to spend...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that Firefox vs Safari is a personal issue, but then again so is using TextEdit vs Microsoft Word. It all boils down to taste and what you plan to do with it, this list is merely a collection of great software that even the homeless can afford.</p>
<p>While Mail is a nice app, I would hardly consider it &#8220;full-feature&#8221;, not when compared to Thunderbird or Entourage. Mail is leaner most definitely, but on an enterprise level Mail is not going to be your solution.</p>
<p>I do strongly agree with CyberDuck being a better client, especially since Transmit weights in at $29.95 more then we want to spend. Managing an IT department and outfitting hundreds of computers, that&#8217;s an instant savings of over $2,400 with a volume license. To any employers eyes, that&#8217;s better.</p>
<p>As for VLC, I do believe the first point made is it&#8217;s ability to play virtually any file. Not to mention interlacing and post processing.</p>
<p>David, thanks for the NeoOffice tip, I&#8217;ll have to look into it as I&#8217;m not the largest fan of the OpenOffice build.</p>
<p>In the end whatever works best for you is best, we&#8217;re just bringing valid options to the table. I personally use Microsoft Office, CS3, Apple Remote Desktop and a huge list of other pricey software because they&#8217;re better. But if you don&#8217;t have the money to spend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greg</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17065</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17065</guid>
		<description>I like this list, a bunch comes down to personal taste of course.
Eg - I prefer camino over firefox.
My only real disagreement here is UnRARX - The Unarchiver deals with RARs and loads of other file types - all for free.
Oh and Thunderbird is debatable that it saves you $50, but I guess it depends on what e-mail your thinking of. Im a mail.app man myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this list, a bunch comes down to personal taste of course.<br />
Eg &#8211; I prefer camino over firefox.<br />
My only real disagreement here is UnRARX &#8211; The Unarchiver deals with RARs and loads of other file types &#8211; all for free.<br />
Oh and Thunderbird is debatable that it saves you $50, but I guess it depends on what e-mail your thinking of. Im a mail.app man myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadownight</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17063</link>
		<dc:creator>shadownight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17063</guid>
		<description>Honestly, there are some pretty ridiculous parts in this list.

Firefox vs Safari is largely a personal issue: I prefer Safari because it&#039;s leaner, cleaner and faster on my machine â€” I couldn&#039;t care less about a zillion plug-ins. I use Firefox occasionally for Safari-incompatible sites, and the update installer doesn&#039;t even work.

Thunderbird vs Mail: how in the world is that a $50 savings? Last time I checked, Mail was free with OS X. Again, I find Mail leaner, cleaner and elegant. I tried Thunderbird, and while it&#039;s not bad, I don&#039;t see why I would switch from Mail (whose spam filtering works great for me).

Cyberduck: it&#039;s a nice product, and I&#039;m glad it&#039;s free, but &quot;a better product&quot;? Than Transmit, you mean? Again, that&#039;s purely a personal choice.

VLC vs QuickTime: In my opinion, VLC&#039;s strength it not full screen playback, it&#039;s that it reads a zillion video formats.

Etc, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, there are some pretty ridiculous parts in this list.</p>
<p>Firefox vs Safari is largely a personal issue: I prefer Safari because it&#8217;s leaner, cleaner and faster on my machine â€” I couldn&#8217;t care less about a zillion plug-ins. I use Firefox occasionally for Safari-incompatible sites, and the update installer doesn&#8217;t even work.</p>
<p>Thunderbird vs Mail: how in the world is that a $50 savings? Last time I checked, Mail was free with OS X. Again, I find Mail leaner, cleaner and elegant. I tried Thunderbird, and while it&#8217;s not bad, I don&#8217;t see why I would switch from Mail (whose spam filtering works great for me).</p>
<p>Cyberduck: it&#8217;s a nice product, and I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s free, but &#8220;a better product&#8221;? Than Transmit, you mean? Again, that&#8217;s purely a personal choice.</p>
<p>VLC vs QuickTime: In my opinion, VLC&#8217;s strength it not full screen playback, it&#8217;s that it reads a zillion video formats.</p>
<p>Etc, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Stalnaker</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17062</link>
		<dc:creator>David Stalnaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17062</guid>
		<description>Great list, but the two things that I&#039;d change are NeoOffice instead of OpenOffice (neooffice is a cocoa port of openoffice, faster, more osx-like, and NO X11), and the unarchiver instead of unrarx (the unarchiver works perfectly, is almost invisible in your workflow, and supports everything i&#039;ve ever seen).

Also, there&#039;s a good few programs that I&#039;ve bought to replace these apps because, quite simply, they were worth the money.  Transmit is by far the best FTP program out there, bar none (I mainly use Coda now, but that has transmit built in).  iWork is the best productivity suite on os x, in my not-so-humble opinion.  I prefer Safari and Mail over Firefox and Thunderbird, but that&#039;s just personal preference.  But the fact that there&#039;s better shareware software doesn&#039;t take away from the quality of the programs on this list, as they will serve their purpose perfectly for many people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list, but the two things that I&#8217;d change are NeoOffice instead of OpenOffice (neooffice is a cocoa port of openoffice, faster, more osx-like, and NO X11), and the unarchiver instead of unrarx (the unarchiver works perfectly, is almost invisible in your workflow, and supports everything i&#8217;ve ever seen).</p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s a good few programs that I&#8217;ve bought to replace these apps because, quite simply, they were worth the money.  Transmit is by far the best FTP program out there, bar none (I mainly use Coda now, but that has transmit built in).  iWork is the best productivity suite on os x, in my not-so-humble opinion.  I prefer Safari and Mail over Firefox and Thunderbird, but that&#8217;s just personal preference.  But the fact that there&#8217;s better shareware software doesn&#8217;t take away from the quality of the programs on this list, as they will serve their purpose perfectly for many people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB-switcher</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17056</link>
		<dc:creator>MB-switcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17056</guid>
		<description>like the list also...almost half of the software I use myself. I am currently trying to make a list like this also in a series of blog entries.
anyways, I must agree that I like the unarchiver a little better also especially since I am a Xee user and the integration of these two awesome apps is just great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like the list also&#8230;almost half of the software I use myself. I am currently trying to make a list like this also in a series of blog entries.<br />
anyways, I must agree that I like the unarchiver a little better also especially since I am a Xee user and the integration of these two awesome apps is just great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis T</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17054</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/10/06/save-up-to-1600-in-software/#comment-17054</guid>
		<description>As much a I liked UnRarX, I&#039;ll have to say that I like The Unarchiver a little more.

Of course it does RAR files but a whole slew of other formats as well.  Plus, it&#039;s fast, just like using the built-in Archive Extractor in OS X. Double-click an archive, it&#039;s extracted. Simple as that!

I&#039;d include a link, but I don&#039;t wanna seem like a spammer. Just Google it. First link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much a I liked UnRarX, I&#8217;ll have to say that I like The Unarchiver a little more.</p>
<p>Of course it does RAR files but a whole slew of other formats as well.  Plus, it&#8217;s fast, just like using the built-in Archive Extractor in OS X. Double-click an archive, it&#8217;s extracted. Simple as that!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d include a link, but I don&#8217;t wanna seem like a spammer. Just Google it. First link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
