<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pixelmator 1.1: Graphic Tablet Support and More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt D</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-119244</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/#comment-119244</guid>
		<description>I tried the first release out and it was real good. Like...really really good. Especially for such a low price ($20-$30 than Elements, I believe) it is quite powerful. I also have to agree that the selection abilities are weak and often make certain tasks impossible, but the integration with Mac OS and the increased performance due to Core Image is noticeable. My biggest gripe is that there is no third-party brush support. Not even a proprietary format of brushes that is only moderately annoying. You have to make your brushes from your own images, which usually ends up requiring GIMP or Photoshop anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the first release out and it was real good. Like&#8230;really really good. Especially for such a low price ($20-$30 than Elements, I believe) it is quite powerful. I also have to agree that the selection abilities are weak and often make certain tasks impossible, but the integration with Mac OS and the increased performance due to Core Image is noticeable. My biggest gripe is that there is no third-party brush support. Not even a proprietary format of brushes that is only moderately annoying. You have to make your brushes from your own images, which usually ends up requiring GIMP or Photoshop anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-59417</link>
		<dc:creator>brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/#comment-59417</guid>
		<description>this is avg. its called gimp people. gimp is better than this, theres so many brush and effect add-ons. it supports tablets as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is avg. its called gimp people. gimp is better than this, theres so many brush and effect add-ons. it supports tablets as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonio Loewald</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-45404</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonio Loewald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/#comment-45404</guid>
		<description>The problem with Pixelmator is that they keep adding sizzle and never fix the steak. It&#039;s got amazing filters but its basic selection tools don&#039;t work and it&#039;s often slow and unresponsive.

That said, it&#039;s free to download and try, as are superior programs with less hype such as Acorn and Photoline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Pixelmator is that they keep adding sizzle and never fix the steak. It&#8217;s got amazing filters but its basic selection tools don&#8217;t work and it&#8217;s often slow and unresponsive.</p>
<p>That said, it&#8217;s free to download and try, as are superior programs with less hype such as Acorn and Photoline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-30841</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/#comment-30841</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with Michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with Michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mistretta</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-30642</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Mistretta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2007/12/10/pixelmator-11-graphic-tablet-support-and-more/#comment-30642</guid>
		<description>I have to say that Pixelmator is looking better and better every day. One more update like this, and I may have to go out and buy it. Great roundup of all the new features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that Pixelmator is looking better and better every day. One more update like this, and I may have to go out and buy it. Great roundup of all the new features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
