<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shoebox: Of Photos and Footwear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2008/03/15/shoebox-of-photos-and-footwear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2008/03/15/shoebox-of-photos-and-footwear/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:39:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marius Masalar</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/03/15/shoebox-of-photos-and-footwear/comment-page-1/#comment-63673</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius Masalar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/03/15/shoebox-of-photos-and-footwear/#comment-63673</guid>
		<description>If you already own Aperture 2 and are happy with how it organizes your photos, then I don&#039;t think it would make too much sense to use Shoebox as well.

On the other hand, if you just use Aperture for its editing features and are looking for a great way to keep your collection well-organized, then I think Shoebox is probably your best bet. 

I think using them in tandem actually makes for a particularly streamlined work environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you already own Aperture 2 and are happy with how it organizes your photos, then I don&#8217;t think it would make too much sense to use Shoebox as well.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you just use Aperture for its editing features and are looking for a great way to keep your collection well-organized, then I think Shoebox is probably your best bet. </p>
<p>I think using them in tandem actually makes for a particularly streamlined work environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/03/15/shoebox-of-photos-and-footwear/comment-page-1/#comment-63586</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/03/15/shoebox-of-photos-and-footwear/#comment-63586</guid>
		<description>Is there any reason to use this if you already own Aperture 2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any reason to use this if you already own Aperture 2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
