<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3: A Safari User&#8217;s Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Carvalho</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-154925</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Carvalho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-154925</guid>
		<description>Very well written article. All the personal opinions are made very clear and didn&#039;t offend anyone who disagrees*.

*This is only valid for visitors able to correctly use their brains.

Thanks,

Antonio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well written article. All the personal opinions are made very clear and didn&#8217;t offend anyone who disagrees*.</p>
<p>*This is only valid for visitors able to correctly use their brains.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Antonio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delaware Valley Web Report</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-140260</link>
		<dc:creator>Delaware Valley Web Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-140260</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Firefox 3 :: Review...&lt;/strong&gt;

The web browser is becoming the new desktop. You hear of things like Web 2.0, Google Apps, and Salesforce.com as the next step in business management and marketing. All of these things depend on an interface between your computer and the Internet. This...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Firefox 3 :: Review&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The web browser is becoming the new desktop. You hear of things like Web 2.0, Google Apps, and Salesforce.com as the next step in business management and marketing. All of these things depend on an interface between your computer and the Internet. This&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefox 3 review &#171; 168sync</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-132337</link>
		<dc:creator>firefox 3 review &#171; 168sync</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-132337</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.techreviewsource.com/content/view/173/, http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/, http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/06/firefox-3-review/, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.techreviewsource.com/content/view/173/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techreviewsource.com/content/view/173/</a>, <a href="http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/" rel="nofollow">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/</a>, <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/06/firefox-3-review/" rel="nofollow">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/06/firefox-3-review/</a>, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-118754</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-118754</guid>
		<description>Firefox is useless, just another browser to the list with another set of render rules to abided to. It does not even handle layers on top of flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is useless, just another browser to the list with another set of render rules to abided to. It does not even handle layers on top of flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Johnson</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-113674</link>
		<dc:creator>William Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-113674</guid>
		<description>I suppose it&#039;s inevitable given the design and graphic-arts roots of the Mac, but comments by Mac users so often emphasize form over function. This &quot;review&quot; (I use the quotes advisedly) and many of the comments bear this out.

The reason I use Firefox isn&#039;t because it&#039;s prettier or uglier than Safari. I use it because it has better functionality, especially from the thousands of available free plugins. By the way, how do you know you &quot;don&#039;t need&quot; any of the plugins if you don&#039;t even know what they are? For that matter, you don&#039;t need a computer at all... just food and water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it&#8217;s inevitable given the design and graphic-arts roots of the Mac, but comments by Mac users so often emphasize form over function. This &#8220;review&#8221; (I use the quotes advisedly) and many of the comments bear this out.</p>
<p>The reason I use Firefox isn&#8217;t because it&#8217;s prettier or uglier than Safari. I use it because it has better functionality, especially from the thousands of available free plugins. By the way, how do you know you &#8220;don&#8217;t need&#8221; any of the plugins if you don&#8217;t even know what they are? For that matter, you don&#8217;t need a computer at all&#8230; just food and water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe in oklahoma</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-107727</link>
		<dc:creator>joe in oklahoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-107727</guid>
		<description>i like the new FF interface, and i will try to use it for more than a day to see how much i like it...i have used it off and on. what keeps me coming back to safari:

smaller/larger text buttons ...i really wish FF had these
history ...i prefer safari&#039;s approach, though i like the sidebar in FF
bookmark management ...just easier in safari
make a tab into a window  just click on a tab and drag it into the desktop....love it
resize text windows  ...this is cool,  espec when a website gives you a small box to write in
find bar  .... both are good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the new FF interface, and i will try to use it for more than a day to see how much i like it&#8230;i have used it off and on. what keeps me coming back to safari:</p>
<p>smaller/larger text buttons &#8230;i really wish FF had these<br />
history &#8230;i prefer safari&#8217;s approach, though i like the sidebar in FF<br />
bookmark management &#8230;just easier in safari<br />
make a tab into a window  just click on a tab and drag it into the desktop&#8230;.love it<br />
resize text windows  &#8230;this is cool,  espec when a website gives you a small box to write in<br />
find bar  &#8230;. both are good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHC</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-103044</link>
		<dc:creator>MHC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-103044</guid>
		<description>Firefox 3, as it stands now, doesn&#039;t support AppleScript.

http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2008/06/applescript-is-broken-in-firefox-3/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3, as it stands now, doesn&#8217;t support AppleScript.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2008/06/applescript-is-broken-in-firefox-3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2008/06/applescript-is-broken-in-firefox-3/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insomnic</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-102128</link>
		<dc:creator>Insomnic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-102128</guid>
		<description>I can understand some of these viewpoints as I prefered Safari over Firefox 2. There are still some things I like better in Safari really, but Firefox 3 is a major improvement over Firefox 2; the memory footprint and rendering is so much better. I&#039;m glad some one mentioned the &quot;small icons&quot; option to fix that huge back button - the same trick works on PC and Linux as well.
I will say that I have switched to FF3 over Safari and my main reasons are the add-ons and the better flash/java handling. Even though things like twurl and Safari Adblock helped, some of FF3&#039;s add-ons and new updates finally got me switched over. If you aren&#039;t that worried about add-ons though - I think Safari vs Firefox 3 is gonna be a long debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand some of these viewpoints as I prefered Safari over Firefox 2. There are still some things I like better in Safari really, but Firefox 3 is a major improvement over Firefox 2; the memory footprint and rendering is so much better. I&#8217;m glad some one mentioned the &#8220;small icons&#8221; option to fix that huge back button &#8211; the same trick works on PC and Linux as well.<br />
I will say that I have switched to FF3 over Safari and my main reasons are the add-ons and the better flash/java handling. Even though things like twurl and Safari Adblock helped, some of FF3&#8217;s add-ons and new updates finally got me switched over. If you aren&#8217;t that worried about add-ons though &#8211; I think Safari vs Firefox 3 is gonna be a long debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefox icons</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-101201</link>
		<dc:creator>firefox icons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-101201</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fridge</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-101068</link>
		<dc:creator>fridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-101068</guid>
		<description>Firefox 3 can manage, sort and tag your bookmarks! You go mental trying to organize thousands of bookmarks on Safari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3 can manage, sort and tag your bookmarks! You go mental trying to organize thousands of bookmarks on Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: internet explorer icons</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-101006</link>
		<dc:creator>internet explorer icons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-101006</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3: A Safari User&#8217;s Review, reviewed &#171; Tom Sucks</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-101004</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3: A Safari User&#8217;s Review, reviewed &#171; Tom Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-101004</guid>
		<description>[...] the ignorance. I just picked up Firefox 3: A Safari User&#8217;s Review by Peter Craddock. He obviously notices the huge back button, and while I thought most mac users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ignorance. I just picked up Firefox 3: A Safari User&#8217;s Review by Peter Craddock. He obviously notices the huge back button, and while I thought most mac users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: explorer for mac</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-100093</link>
		<dc:creator>explorer for mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-100093</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: database standards</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99892</link>
		<dc:creator>database standards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99892</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99659</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99659</guid>
		<description>The giant back button can easily be changed by customizing the toolbar (view -&gt; toolbars -&gt; customize) and checking the &quot;Use Small Icons&quot; check box at the bottom.  The back button is the only icon that is changed by that check box.

The way the location bar is selected can be changed pretty easily by changing the browser.urlbar.clickSelectsAll setting in the about:config to false.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The giant back button can easily be changed by customizing the toolbar (view -&gt; toolbars -&gt; customize) and checking the &#8220;Use Small Icons&#8221; check box at the bottom.  The back button is the only icon that is changed by that check box.</p>
<p>The way the location bar is selected can be changed pretty easily by changing the browser.urlbar.clickSelectsAll setting in the about:config to false.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Majd Taby</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99390</link>
		<dc:creator>Majd Taby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99390</guid>
		<description>I have given FF3 a few serious tries. I used to be an avid FF user, but switched to Safari a while back, and I can&#039;t get myself to use FF regularly.

First, the  â€œrecent use &amp; favouritesâ€ drop-down menu in my opinion is horrrible and is among the top three reasons I can&#039;t use FF3. The mix of colors, font sizes, and favicons adds a _lot_ of confusion. Moreover, I personally remember URLS, and not Titles. As a result, I have to squint at the small low-contrast URLs to see the page I want. 

Another gripe is the progress bar (yes, I know about Fission)..it&#039;s way in the lower right corner, on the total opposite side of the browser than the location bar (an inconvenient separation).

Another gripe I have is how the location bar is selected (An issue brought up by Gruber).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have given FF3 a few serious tries. I used to be an avid FF user, but switched to Safari a while back, and I can&#8217;t get myself to use FF regularly.</p>
<p>First, the  â€œrecent use &amp; favouritesâ€ drop-down menu in my opinion is horrrible and is among the top three reasons I can&#8217;t use FF3. The mix of colors, font sizes, and favicons adds a _lot_ of confusion. Moreover, I personally remember URLS, and not Titles. As a result, I have to squint at the small low-contrast URLs to see the page I want. </p>
<p>Another gripe is the progress bar (yes, I know about Fission)..it&#8217;s way in the lower right corner, on the total opposite side of the browser than the location bar (an inconvenient separation).</p>
<p>Another gripe I have is how the location bar is selected (An issue brought up by Gruber).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99386</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99386</guid>
		<description>While this a good critical review, you fail to mention one huge positive about FF3. It is at least three times as fast as the old FF3, and it renders java in significantly less time than Safari does. It also loads much faster than FF2 and uses less memory while opened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this a good critical review, you fail to mention one huge positive about FF3. It is at least three times as fast as the old FF3, and it renders java in significantly less time than Safari does. It also loads much faster than FF2 and uses less memory while opened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmaspero</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99349</link>
		<dc:creator>rmaspero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99349</guid>
		<description>I have tried it and on the Mac it is a big step forwards for Firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried it and on the Mac it is a big step forwards for Firefox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Craddock</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99308</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Craddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99308</guid>
		<description>@ Jim: if you had read the review, you would have noticed I did mention the theme. Not by name, but I linked to a complete tutorial on the subject.

While I agree the site-specific preferences are a great tool, they aren&#039;t that obvious, and Mozilla&#039;s explanation of the feature certainly doesn&#039;t help.

Thank you for mentioning Nightly Tester Tools. I wasn&#039;t aware of it, as I&#039;ve never been big into Firefox plug-ins, and didn&#039;t follow all the information available once the Firefox 3 public beta came out.

As an ending note, do not forget I took the point of view of a Safari user. If you want a Firefox-user&#039;s review, I&#039;m sure you can find plenty of such reviews. The point of this review is to give a &quot;first user&#039;s&quot; look. This isn&#039;t for hardcore Firefox users.

PS: this article was pro-bono.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jim: if you had read the review, you would have noticed I did mention the theme. Not by name, but I linked to a complete tutorial on the subject.</p>
<p>While I agree the site-specific preferences are a great tool, they aren&#8217;t that obvious, and Mozilla&#8217;s explanation of the feature certainly doesn&#8217;t help.</p>
<p>Thank you for mentioning Nightly Tester Tools. I wasn&#8217;t aware of it, as I&#8217;ve never been big into Firefox plug-ins, and didn&#8217;t follow all the information available once the Firefox 3 public beta came out.</p>
<p>As an ending note, do not forget I took the point of view of a Safari user. If you want a Firefox-user&#8217;s review, I&#8217;m sure you can find plenty of such reviews. The point of this review is to give a &#8220;first user&#8217;s&#8221; look. This isn&#8217;t for hardcore Firefox users.</p>
<p>PS: this article was pro-bono.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Turner</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99307</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99307</guid>
		<description>@Jim: Does a review really have to say everything about an app?  If so, most articles would be ~30 paragraphs long.  You can&#039;t just write an article about some nice features in an app, you have to interest yourself to interest others.  The fact that you posted a comment here, means he interested you.  So he didn&#039;t realize that there were a few things he left out.  You people have to realize that a writers&#039; 1st review may not be his best one!  It takes time to be able to write a review that every reader will like (even you).  As I have said before, don&#039;t post pointless comments in a review.  You comment is neither helpful, or interesting to anyone.  If you have a concern or comment about our reviews, post it in the feedback area of our forums!

Thank you for your insightful, and interesting comment Jim!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim: Does a review really have to say everything about an app?  If so, most articles would be ~30 paragraphs long.  You can&#8217;t just write an article about some nice features in an app, you have to interest yourself to interest others.  The fact that you posted a comment here, means he interested you.  So he didn&#8217;t realize that there were a few things he left out.  You people have to realize that a writers&#8217; 1st review may not be his best one!  It takes time to be able to write a review that every reader will like (even you).  As I have said before, don&#8217;t post pointless comments in a review.  You comment is neither helpful, or interesting to anyone.  If you have a concern or comment about our reviews, post it in the feedback area of our forums!</p>
<p>Thank you for your insightful, and interesting comment Jim!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99301</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99301</guid>
		<description>Oh come-on guys, is this what you consider a review??? This looks like a small (very small) list of personal gripes from an uninformed troll.

One of your complaints is the GUI&#039;s toolbar buttons, yet you don&#039;t mention you can easily change them with a theme. I got rid of the large Back button with gRApple - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thegraphicmac.com/whats-your-firefox&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;see my article on Firefox Extensions here&lt;/a&gt; - I have a screenshot in case you aren&#039;t familiar with it.

You bring up the Favicon, mention the Who-Is feature, but don&#039;t even mention that you can also set site-specific preferences in that very same box that comes up. That&#039;s kind of a HUGE feature to leave out, no?

You mention plug-in compatibility before upgrading to FF3, but don&#039;t mention Nightly Tester Tools which will make most all plug-ins compatible with any version of FF. That&#039;s something someone considering upgrading might want to know, perhaps?

Did someone force you to write this &quot;review&quot; (I use that term lightly), or is this the typical review here? Uninformed, uninspired. I realize that the payment per article is really, really low - but if you&#039;re going to do something, at least put some effort into it. And MacApper, you need to seriously start editing your writers. Of course, choosing better ones would be even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come-on guys, is this what you consider a review??? This looks like a small (very small) list of personal gripes from an uninformed troll.</p>
<p>One of your complaints is the GUI&#8217;s toolbar buttons, yet you don&#8217;t mention you can easily change them with a theme. I got rid of the large Back button with gRApple &#8211; <a href="http://www.thegraphicmac.com/whats-your-firefox" rel="nofollow">see my article on Firefox Extensions here</a> &#8211; I have a screenshot in case you aren&#8217;t familiar with it.</p>
<p>You bring up the Favicon, mention the Who-Is feature, but don&#8217;t even mention that you can also set site-specific preferences in that very same box that comes up. That&#8217;s kind of a HUGE feature to leave out, no?</p>
<p>You mention plug-in compatibility before upgrading to FF3, but don&#8217;t mention Nightly Tester Tools which will make most all plug-ins compatible with any version of FF. That&#8217;s something someone considering upgrading might want to know, perhaps?</p>
<p>Did someone force you to write this &#8220;review&#8221; (I use that term lightly), or is this the typical review here? Uninformed, uninspired. I realize that the payment per article is really, really low &#8211; but if you&#8217;re going to do something, at least put some effort into it. And MacApper, you need to seriously start editing your writers. Of course, choosing better ones would be even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yonghwee</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99297</link>
		<dc:creator>Yonghwee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99297</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been using Camino but Firefox 3 felt snappier on my iBook G4. Might spend more time with it before making a decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been using Camino but Firefox 3 felt snappier on my iBook G4. Might spend more time with it before making a decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99279</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99279</guid>
		<description>While I think Safari 3.0 generates a better look to web pages, especially when I set a minimum font size, I use Firefox.   The privacy features (cookie blocking) are just too weak for me to be comfortable using Safari on a day to day basis.   The add-on architecture for Firefox is far better than the kludge methods you have to use for Safari.   Safari is about 80% of what I want in a browser and Firefox is close to 95%.  I also have Camino installed and I use one website that neither Firefox 3RC1 or Safari 3.1 will load, but Camino happily loads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think Safari 3.0 generates a better look to web pages, especially when I set a minimum font size, I use Firefox.   The privacy features (cookie blocking) are just too weak for me to be comfortable using Safari on a day to day basis.   The add-on architecture for Firefox is far better than the kludge methods you have to use for Safari.   Safari is about 80% of what I want in a browser and Firefox is close to 95%.  I also have Camino installed and I use one website that neither Firefox 3RC1 or Safari 3.1 will load, but Camino happily loads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bisley</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99249</link>
		<dc:creator>bisley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99249</guid>
		<description>Nice review, but you miss an important improvement about recent use. When you try to put an url written before you can write the domain or any word in the title&#039;s pages, easier to find some webpages you visited before. An example: &quot;macapp fire rev&quot; and you will get this page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review, but you miss an important improvement about recent use. When you try to put an url written before you can write the domain or any word in the title&#8217;s pages, easier to find some webpages you visited before. An example: &#8220;macapp fire rev&#8221; and you will get this page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/comment-page-1/#comment-99219</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/2008/06/01/publish-firefox-3-a-safari-users-review/#comment-99219</guid>
		<description>Hmm. This feels more like a witchhunt than a review. 

I used to use Firefox but was tired of it hogging memory, so I&#039;ve been using Camino and Safari for a year now. Now I&#039;m back to Firefox and loving it. The interface is elegant and features like the smart history and the add-ons make it wonderful to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. This feels more like a witchhunt than a review. </p>
<p>I used to use Firefox but was tired of it hogging memory, so I&#8217;ve been using Camino and Safari for a year now. Now I&#8217;m back to Firefox and loving it. The interface is elegant and features like the smart history and the add-ons make it wonderful to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
