<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard &#8211; January 2009?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2008/06/07/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard-january-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/07/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard-january-2009/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3: The Browser War Just Got a Lot Hotter &#124; MacApper</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/07/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard-january-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-116720</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3: The Browser War Just Got a Lot Hotter &#124; MacApper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=4270#comment-116720</guid>
		<description>[...] and native-looking widgets, the feel isn&#8217;t quite there due to the Carbon structure. And with rumors of the next OS X release dropping support for Carbon applications, I would expect Mozilla will soon be stepping up its Cocoa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and native-looking widgets, the feel isn&#8217;t quite there due to the Carbon structure. And with rumors of the next OS X release dropping support for Carbon applications, I would expect Mozilla will soon be stepping up its Cocoa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/07/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard-january-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-107844</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=4270#comment-107844</guid>
		<description>From screen shots I&#039;ve seen, it also supports 32-bit Intel processors as the person who captured the screen shots was running on a Core Duo, not Core 2 Duo, processor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From screen shots I&#8217;ve seen, it also supports 32-bit Intel processors as the person who captured the screen shots was running on a Core Duo, not Core 2 Duo, processor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chriswan</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/07/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard-january-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-106622</link>
		<dc:creator>Chriswan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=4270#comment-106622</guid>
		<description>It seems that it will still support PPC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that it will still support PPC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaetan</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/07/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard-january-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-105386</link>
		<dc:creator>gaetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=4270#comment-105386</guid>
		<description>Would they drop rosseta? One more day, we will know.
I think they cannot drop it already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would they drop rosseta? One more day, we will know.<br />
I think they cannot drop it already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chriswan</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/06/07/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard-january-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-104466</link>
		<dc:creator>Chriswan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=4270#comment-104466</guid>
		<description>Intel only, nice...

but, what about Office 2004? :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel only, nice&#8230;</p>
<p>but, what about Office 2004? <img src='http://macapper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
