<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VirusBarrier Review: Clean and Simple Virus Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerald Taibi</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-167554</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerald Taibi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-167554</guid>
		<description>I cling on to listening in the route of rumor talk about obtaining boundless online dependent grant programs so i&#039;ve been seeking out close to to for that best online internet site to acquire one. Could you reveal to me please, notably in which could i arrive around some?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cling on to listening in the route of rumor talk about obtaining boundless online dependent grant programs so i&#8217;ve been seeking out close to to for that best online internet site to acquire one. Could you reveal to me please, notably in which could i arrive around some?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikray</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-163910</link>
		<dc:creator>mikray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-163910</guid>
		<description>Hi Guys, I just found a pretty nice site for unlock / jailbreak/ iphone 3g 3gs and iphone4 jailbreak.

http://www.anysim.net
http://www.bmw-eba.de.tl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys, I just found a pretty nice site for unlock / jailbreak/ iphone 3g 3gs and iphone4 jailbreak.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.anysim.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.anysim.net</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bmw-eba.de.tl" rel="nofollow">http://www.bmw-eba.de.tl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Turner</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153385</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153385</guid>
		<description>Actually, the iPod Touch is there, it is a filesystem. Apple just has it hidden from a GUI. You can access it other ways though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the iPod Touch is there, it is a filesystem. Apple just has it hidden from a GUI. You can access it other ways though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: westerneyes</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153384</link>
		<dc:creator>westerneyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153384</guid>
		<description>Since the ipod touch (unhacked) cannot mount, how does virusbarrier examine it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the ipod touch (unhacked) cannot mount, how does virusbarrier examine it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153333</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153333</guid>
		<description>Any other software in addition to VirusBarrier X5, Symantec Norton Anti-Virus 11 for Macintosh and McAfee VirusScan for Mac? Is there NOD32 or Kaspersky products for Mac?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any other software in addition to VirusBarrier X5, Symantec Norton Anti-Virus 11 for Macintosh and McAfee VirusScan for Mac? Is there NOD32 or Kaspersky products for Mac?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fyre Vortex</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153199</link>
		<dc:creator>Fyre Vortex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153199</guid>
		<description>jxn: I would too.

Stuart: I don&#039;t think Norton is good on Mac right now, but the new Norton 2009 products have definitely improved from the previous products. Let&#039;s hope Kaspersky, BitDefender, ESET, and the other big vendors bring something good to beat them back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jxn: I would too.</p>
<p>Stuart: I don&#8217;t think Norton is good on Mac right now, but the new Norton 2009 products have definitely improved from the previous products. Let&#8217;s hope Kaspersky, BitDefender, ESET, and the other big vendors bring something good to beat them back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce A</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153191</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153191</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you read many Mac news sites, you will see that the number of Mac viruses has increased lately.&quot;

Oh? I&#039;ve seen one or two reports of Mac viruses (always from Intego) in the last couple years and they&#039;re never viruses in the wild, and they&#039;re never able to self-propagate. You&#039;ll pardon me if I fail to rush to Intego to buy their &quot;protection&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you read many Mac news sites, you will see that the number of Mac viruses has increased lately.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh? I&#8217;ve seen one or two reports of Mac viruses (always from Intego) in the last couple years and they&#8217;re never viruses in the wild, and they&#8217;re never able to self-propagate. You&#8217;ll pardon me if I fail to rush to Intego to buy their &#8220;protection&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Turner</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153190</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153190</guid>
		<description>Yes, this is true. It is not a big enough issue to be worried yet. I may not have conveyed it enough in the article.

@Stuart: I don&#039;t think Norton is good either... There were quotes around good before to make this clearer...

I am sorry to all if I made viruses sound like an amazingly big issue, but I am just trying to say that you shouldn&#039;t go unprotected... Even on a Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is true. It is not a big enough issue to be worried yet. I may not have conveyed it enough in the article.</p>
<p>@Stuart: I don&#8217;t think Norton is good either&#8230; There were quotes around good before to make this clearer&#8230;</p>
<p>I am sorry to all if I made viruses sound like an amazingly big issue, but I am just trying to say that you shouldn&#8217;t go unprotected&#8230; Even on a Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153189</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153189</guid>
		<description>I have never used the word &#039;good&#039; and &#039;Norton&quot; in the same sentence.  I guess I just did, but never again!

The Clam is working just fine for my purposes.  Also I have been using the a familiar piece of hardware to stop viruses: my brain.  I think a great majority of Mac users have this cool hardware, and therefore already have builtin virus protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never used the word &#8216;good&#8217; and &#8216;Norton&#8221; in the same sentence.  I guess I just did, but never again!</p>
<p>The Clam is working just fine for my purposes.  Also I have been using the a familiar piece of hardware to stop viruses: my brain.  I think a great majority of Mac users have this cool hardware, and therefore already have builtin virus protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dex</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153187</link>
		<dc:creator>dex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153187</guid>
		<description>I regard the ugly interface a BIG con. And I believe that the current state of virus danger is not great enough for paid application if we have a free and well working ClamXav X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I regard the ugly interface a BIG con. And I believe that the current state of virus danger is not great enough for paid application if we have a free and well working ClamXav X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Turner</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153185</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153185</guid>
		<description>Comparatively, there have been. If you read many Mac news sites, you will see that the number of Mac viruses has increased lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparatively, there have been. If you read many Mac news sites, you will see that the number of Mac viruses has increased lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jxn</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153184</link>
		<dc:creator>jxn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153184</guid>
		<description>Can you please source where you got the &quot;In the last few months there have been many new Mac viruses&quot; claim from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please source where you got the &#8220;In the last few months there have been many new Mac viruses&#8221; claim from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fyre Vortex</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153183</link>
		<dc:creator>Fyre Vortex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153183</guid>
		<description>The interface looks pretty good/advanced and high-tech, but if it was free floating without the &quot;window&quot; then it would look even cooler.

Pushing the interface talk aside, it seems quite good.

Oh, and a typo-It&#039;s &quot;Symantec&quot;, not Symantic. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interface looks pretty good/advanced and high-tech, but if it was free floating without the &#8220;window&#8221; then it would look even cooler.</p>
<p>Pushing the interface talk aside, it seems quite good.</p>
<p>Oh, and a typo-It&#8217;s &#8220;Symantec&#8221;, not Symantic. <img src='http://macapper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Craddock</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153181</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Craddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153181</guid>
		<description>I was also shocked to see such a bold statement: &quot;In the last few months there have been many new Mac viruses&quot;.
Please don&#039;t spread fear without basis, and use the correct terminology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was also shocked to see such a bold statement: &#8220;In the last few months there have been many new Mac viruses&#8221;.<br />
Please don&#8217;t spread fear without basis, and use the correct terminology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Barsky</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2008/12/15/virusbarrier-review-clean-and-simple-virus-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-153179</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Barsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=5586#comment-153179</guid>
		<description>As a Public Service Announcement, there have NOT &quot;been many new Mac viruses&quot;. There have been a handful of Mac targeted Trojan&#039;s, usually spread from porn sites. No need to create fear where there should be only level-headed, logical thought. Don&#039;t download and/or install anything, especially if it requires superuser/root access, unless you trust the source. If you trust porn sites as sources, well, then, good luck to you.

Regardless, anti-virus apps for the Mac are a good idea, especially if we want to protect our Windows using brethren from further infection. Intego&#039;s VirusBarrier is a good product. I gave it a whirl on a PPC 1.42GHz Mac mini. It did it&#039;s job without too much interference. More than I can say for any anti-virus apps I&#039;ve used on the Windows side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Public Service Announcement, there have NOT &#8220;been many new Mac viruses&#8221;. There have been a handful of Mac targeted Trojan&#8217;s, usually spread from porn sites. No need to create fear where there should be only level-headed, logical thought. Don&#8217;t download and/or install anything, especially if it requires superuser/root access, unless you trust the source. If you trust porn sites as sources, well, then, good luck to you.</p>
<p>Regardless, anti-virus apps for the Mac are a good idea, especially if we want to protect our Windows using brethren from further infection. Intego&#8217;s VirusBarrier is a good product. I gave it a whirl on a PPC 1.42GHz Mac mini. It did it&#8217;s job without too much interference. More than I can say for any anti-virus apps I&#8217;ve used on the Windows side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

