<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinion: Apple Vetoes AppStore Nudity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2009/07/06/news-apple-vetoes-appstore-nudity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/06/news-apple-vetoes-appstore-nudity/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James C</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/06/news-apple-vetoes-appstore-nudity/comment-page-1/#comment-156318</link>
		<dc:creator>James C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=8726#comment-156318</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why does the iPhone Developer Program allow developers to make changes directly from the server in the first place?&quot;

If they disallowed content changes server side there would be no Facebook app, nothing to check for movies or weather, hell no Safari access because those applications access content on servers that aren&#039;t controlled by Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why does the iPhone Developer Program allow developers to make changes directly from the server in the first place?&#8221;</p>
<p>If they disallowed content changes server side there would be no Facebook app, nothing to check for movies or weather, hell no Safari access because those applications access content on servers that aren&#8217;t controlled by Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptSaltyJack</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/06/news-apple-vetoes-appstore-nudity/comment-page-1/#comment-156312</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptSaltyJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=8726#comment-156312</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right, the 17+ rating is intended for depiction of drug use, adult situations and themes, and intense violence (including decapitations, other severed limbs, exploding guts, blood, and more). But no absolutely no boobs, because that would be crossing the line.

Gotta love the &quot;puritan&quot; US of A where it&#039;s okay to have a 14 year old kid watch images of people getting shot and blown up, but not okay to show boobs. Also note, there is a strong distinction between erotic images (showing nude women) and explicit pornography (sex acts), which I don&#039;t think should be shown to a younger audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, the 17+ rating is intended for depiction of drug use, adult situations and themes, and intense violence (including decapitations, other severed limbs, exploding guts, blood, and more). But no absolutely no boobs, because that would be crossing the line.</p>
<p>Gotta love the &#8220;puritan&#8221; US of A where it&#8217;s okay to have a 14 year old kid watch images of people getting shot and blown up, but not okay to show boobs. Also note, there is a strong distinction between erotic images (showing nude women) and explicit pornography (sex acts), which I don&#8217;t think should be shown to a younger audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
