<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinion: New Final Cut Studio Not Worth Upgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/</link>
	<description>Mac Apps, Reviews, Previews, Interviews, and Giveaways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shalonda Cimeno</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-168962</link>
		<dc:creator>Shalonda Cimeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-168962</guid>
		<description>Wow thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a951159</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-168786</link>
		<dc:creator>a951159</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-168786</guid>
		<description>951159 beers on the wall.  sck was here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>951159 beers on the wall.  sck was here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idrive</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-167624</link>
		<dc:creator>idrive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-167624</guid>
		<description>The folks over at Tapbots have released an update to their Twitter client for the iPhone and iPod touch. http://www.itube-stream.de.tl This update adds a couple of useful features. One of these features gives you the ability to add sleep time for its push notifications. This allows you to set a block of time to turn off notifications from Twitter so that you can sleep easy and uninterrupted. Another useful feature is the ability to only receive notifications from people that you follow. Thirdly, have you ever reported a spammer or blocked someone and had to live with the fact that their tweets were still polluting your timeline? http://www.anysim.net Well fret no mo because once you block or spam someone with this new update, their tweets will be automatically removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks over at Tapbots have released an update to their Twitter client for the iPhone and iPod touch. <a href="http://www.itube-stream.de.tl" rel="nofollow">http://www.itube-stream.de.tl</a> This update adds a couple of useful features. One of these features gives you the ability to add sleep time for its push notifications. This allows you to set a block of time to turn off notifications from Twitter so that you can sleep easy and uninterrupted. Another useful feature is the ability to only receive notifications from people that you follow. Thirdly, have you ever reported a spammer or blocked someone and had to live with the fact that their tweets were still polluting your timeline? <a href="http://www.anysim.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.anysim.net</a> Well fret no mo because once you block or spam someone with this new update, their tweets will be automatically removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitzi</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-165364</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-165364</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s worth it just to have the glitches worked out of Compressor. FCP 5, the version I had before Compressor was just next to useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth it just to have the glitches worked out of Compressor. FCP 5, the version I had before Compressor was just next to useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loriee</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-165022</link>
		<dc:creator>loriee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-165022</guid>
		<description>WSJ states that users will now be able to access content on their iTunes without having to tether their devices to the computer. Files from the users database will be delivered wirelessly to the user’s device. At the “All Things D8” conference, Steve Jobs sat down with Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher and explained that Apple is looking towards moving towards the Cloud. In typical Apple fashion, SJ didn’t give an exact date or time period in which Apple will be introducing Cloud computing in their mobile platform www.anysim.net or www.bmw-eba.de.tl and www.ohnezinsen.de.tl . As far as music goes, Cupertino has seriously been looking into applying the Cloud to that content, however, its been said that some sticky licensing issues to the content has been the hold up for the feature making it to market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WSJ states that users will now be able to access content on their iTunes without having to tether their devices to the computer. Files from the users database will be delivered wirelessly to the user’s device. At the “All Things D8” conference, Steve Jobs sat down with Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher and explained that Apple is looking towards moving towards the Cloud. In typical Apple fashion, SJ didn’t give an exact date or time period in which Apple will be introducing Cloud computing in their mobile platform <a href="http://www.anysim.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.anysim.net</a> or <a href="http://www.bmw-eba.de.tl" rel="nofollow">http://www.bmw-eba.de.tl</a> and <a href="http://www.ohnezinsen.de.tl" rel="nofollow">http://www.ohnezinsen.de.tl</a> . As far as music goes, Cupertino has seriously been looking into applying the Cloud to that content, however, its been said that some sticky licensing issues to the content has been the hold up for the feature making it to market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idrive</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-163369</link>
		<dc:creator>idrive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-163369</guid>
		<description>Hi Guys,    I just found   a pretty nice site for unlock   /  jailbreak/   iphone 3g 3gs and iphone4 jailbreak.

http://www.anysim.net
http://www.bmw-eba.de.tl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys,    I just found   a pretty nice site for unlock   /  jailbreak/   iphone 3g 3gs and iphone4 jailbreak.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.anysim.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.anysim.net</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bmw-eba.de.tl" rel="nofollow">http://www.bmw-eba.de.tl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boomshadows</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-160458</link>
		<dc:creator>boomshadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 04:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-160458</guid>
		<description>Hey,

Sure the package could have been more exciting but background rendering? Wow, that may have been a long time coming for those long committed, however that doesn&#039;t stop it being a great feature.  There is one feature and one feature only that I think would have really justified the full number update (You gotta also agree the numbering is pretty insignificant for cutters but people seem to take it seriously).  Only one feature would really deliver that knock out blow ... 64BIT.  End of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>Sure the package could have been more exciting but background rendering? Wow, that may have been a long time coming for those long committed, however that doesn&#8217;t stop it being a great feature.  There is one feature and one feature only that I think would have really justified the full number update (You gotta also agree the numbering is pretty insignificant for cutters but people seem to take it seriously).  Only one feature would really deliver that knock out blow &#8230; 64BIT.  End of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APTX Berlin</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-158728</link>
		<dc:creator>APTX Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-158728</guid>
		<description>FCP is a nice tool even for voice over people like us. Keep on growing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCP is a nice tool even for voice over people like us. Keep on growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STONEY XL</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-158022</link>
		<dc:creator>STONEY XL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-158022</guid>
		<description>Well I came here right as I was about to click the install button to see if I really wanted to take the plunge, as my company took the advice of a non-technical member of our team and bought the upgrade package.  I wanted to see if I&#039;d get 64-bit performance out of my SL 1st gen 8-core or not?  Don&#039;t kill the writer.  Apple is no stranger to hyperbole.  Every announcement by them is about something &quot;revolutionary.&quot;  I love my Apple products AND have used FCP since version 1.0.  But giordano has made the most compelling argument for me to jump as I had forgotten about the &quot;open timeline feature&quot; and know that I&#039;ll be mixing at least 3 flavors of HD in the near future. cheers 2 all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I came here right as I was about to click the install button to see if I really wanted to take the plunge, as my company took the advice of a non-technical member of our team and bought the upgrade package.  I wanted to see if I&#8217;d get 64-bit performance out of my SL 1st gen 8-core or not?  Don&#8217;t kill the writer.  Apple is no stranger to hyperbole.  Every announcement by them is about something &#8220;revolutionary.&#8221;  I love my Apple products AND have used FCP since version 1.0.  But giordano has made the most compelling argument for me to jump as I had forgotten about the &#8220;open timeline feature&#8221; and know that I&#8217;ll be mixing at least 3 flavors of HD in the near future. cheers 2 all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helenino</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-157105</link>
		<dc:creator>helenino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-157105</guid>
		<description>Zvuk je z?ejm? z kina, perfekt (viz screen). VyÅ¡lo toho vÃ­ce, tak moÅ¾nÃ¡ o?ekÃ¡vejte upgrade &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hkeoo.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fiberglass mesh&lt;/a&gt; VyÅ¡lo toho vÃ­ce kt (viz screen). tak moÅ¾nÃ¡ o?ekÃ¡vejte asdasdsfs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zvuk je z?ejm? z kina, perfekt (viz screen). VyÅ¡lo toho vÃ­ce, tak moÅ¾nÃ¡ o?ekÃ¡vejte upgrade <a href="http://www.hkeoo.com" rel="nofollow">fiberglass mesh</a> VyÅ¡lo toho vÃ­ce kt (viz screen). tak moÅ¾nÃ¡ o?ekÃ¡vejte asdasdsfs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giordano</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156943</link>
		<dc:creator>giordano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156943</guid>
		<description>i just wanted to say that nobody has mentioned the new &#039;open timeline.&#039;  

this alone, without having the software yet, is enough to make me upgrade, even with all of the other (maybe) negligible goodies.

if you&#039;ve made anything on a video camera in the past 5 years, there are chances you are dealing with multiple frame sizes and rates, and your life is miserable trying to do something as simple as edit a reel for yourself.

this is pretty revolutionary, sorry.  being able to mix ntsc with pal, hdv with dv, i mean, even like, vhs footage with xdcam...this is just not to be overlooked, at all.  this makes everything easier for anyone who works in video, whether you are a commercial editor, documentarian, or found footage artists...you can take all your stuff and export in one click...

read the specs better next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just wanted to say that nobody has mentioned the new &#8216;open timeline.&#8217;  </p>
<p>this alone, without having the software yet, is enough to make me upgrade, even with all of the other (maybe) negligible goodies.</p>
<p>if you&#8217;ve made anything on a video camera in the past 5 years, there are chances you are dealing with multiple frame sizes and rates, and your life is miserable trying to do something as simple as edit a reel for yourself.</p>
<p>this is pretty revolutionary, sorry.  being able to mix ntsc with pal, hdv with dv, i mean, even like, vhs footage with xdcam&#8230;this is just not to be overlooked, at all.  this makes everything easier for anyone who works in video, whether you are a commercial editor, documentarian, or found footage artists&#8230;you can take all your stuff and export in one click&#8230;</p>
<p>read the specs better next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raqcoon mammal</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156689</link>
		<dc:creator>raqcoon mammal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156689</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to upgrade. It&#039;s common for major applications to upgrade every two years or so, especially in video when things change rapidly. I think subsequent incremental upgrades within this new suite will be free, so there&#039;s continuous development that users will benefit from in the next two years. Although there might not be anything obviously earth-shattering, there&#039;s probably a lot of accumulative back-end improvements that all add up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to upgrade. It&#8217;s common for major applications to upgrade every two years or so, especially in video when things change rapidly. I think subsequent incremental upgrades within this new suite will be free, so there&#8217;s continuous development that users will benefit from in the next two years. Although there might not be anything obviously earth-shattering, there&#8217;s probably a lot of accumulative back-end improvements that all add up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digital dream/films</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156632</link>
		<dc:creator>digital dream/films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156632</guid>
		<description>everyone stop complaining......make money with what you got....fcp works fine..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everyone stop complaining&#8230;&#8230;make money with what you got&#8230;.fcp works fine..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Freese</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156631</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Freese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 07:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156631</guid>
		<description>Hi

I totally agree with this article, i was shocked to see no new features but just integrated 3rd party compatibility and speed improvements, these should be updates not in a UPGRADE, anyone who disagrees with this article is been hypocritically blind to the facts mentioned here on all that., the new FCP is nothing new at all no matter how much people think they saved in there company, features and improvements are what you pay for in a upgrade., those other updates are more less for professional standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I totally agree with this article, i was shocked to see no new features but just integrated 3rd party compatibility and speed improvements, these should be updates not in a UPGRADE, anyone who disagrees with this article is been hypocritically blind to the facts mentioned here on all that., the new FCP is nothing new at all no matter how much people think they saved in there company, features and improvements are what you pay for in a upgrade., those other updates are more less for professional standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel Matsuoka</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156601</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel Matsuoka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156601</guid>
		<description>This is one of the best link-bait articles I&#039;ve seen in a long time. But it&#039;s just that: link-bait, with almost zero substance or insight to warrant such a provocative headline.

If you seriously cannot see how none of the new features and workflows in FCS3 will save you hours of time (at least save you enough time to make the miniscule $299 upgrade cost worth it), then you are not a serious user of Final Cut Studio. And if you are not a serious user of Final Cut Studio, then you honestly shouldn&#039;t be writing something with the authoritative title of &quot;New Final Cut Studio Not Worth Upgrade&quot;, because it you truly don&#039;t know what you are talking about.

There is valid argument to be made regarding whether FCS3 deserved the full-point version number increases that some of the apps got. I *do* consider many of the &quot;new&quot; features to be just massive bug-fixes. But it is absolutely undebatable that combined, the new &quot;features&quot; of FCS3 will significantly save any serious editor or content creator both time and money, and if that isn&#039;t worth $299 to you, then you aren&#039;t a professional user of FCS. In which case, the title of your article would be true: But it would be true only for people like YOU. 

Apple clearly listened to the constant complaints that people like me (who aren&#039;t just &quot;frequent users&quot; of FCS, but actually use it on a DAILY basis) have been whining about for years. This is the first release of FCS/FCP where whiz-bang features took the back seat to major improvements to long-standing issues that previously made the lives of professional editors a living hell (in particular, the Media Manager, Send-to-Color integration, speed-changes, markers, etc). 

You claim in your followup that you aren&#039;t expecting &quot;earth shattering features&quot; in upgrades, yet right in your article, you dismissively say &quot;blah blah blah¦ None of these features are so earth shattering I would pay $299 for the upgrade.&quot;  The most interesting (yet unsurprising) thing about your screed is that not ONCE do you ever mention what kind of features you&#039;re looking for which *would* make the insignificantly small $299 upgrade price &quot;worth it&quot; to you.

As it stands, this article is Not Worth the electrons required to display it on one&#039;s computer screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the best link-bait articles I&#8217;ve seen in a long time. But it&#8217;s just that: link-bait, with almost zero substance or insight to warrant such a provocative headline.</p>
<p>If you seriously cannot see how none of the new features and workflows in FCS3 will save you hours of time (at least save you enough time to make the miniscule $299 upgrade cost worth it), then you are not a serious user of Final Cut Studio. And if you are not a serious user of Final Cut Studio, then you honestly shouldn&#8217;t be writing something with the authoritative title of &#8220;New Final Cut Studio Not Worth Upgrade&#8221;, because it you truly don&#8217;t know what you are talking about.</p>
<p>There is valid argument to be made regarding whether FCS3 deserved the full-point version number increases that some of the apps got. I *do* consider many of the &#8220;new&#8221; features to be just massive bug-fixes. But it is absolutely undebatable that combined, the new &#8220;features&#8221; of FCS3 will significantly save any serious editor or content creator both time and money, and if that isn&#8217;t worth $299 to you, then you aren&#8217;t a professional user of FCS. In which case, the title of your article would be true: But it would be true only for people like YOU. </p>
<p>Apple clearly listened to the constant complaints that people like me (who aren&#8217;t just &#8220;frequent users&#8221; of FCS, but actually use it on a DAILY basis) have been whining about for years. This is the first release of FCS/FCP where whiz-bang features took the back seat to major improvements to long-standing issues that previously made the lives of professional editors a living hell (in particular, the Media Manager, Send-to-Color integration, speed-changes, markers, etc). </p>
<p>You claim in your followup that you aren&#8217;t expecting &#8220;earth shattering features&#8221; in upgrades, yet right in your article, you dismissively say &#8220;blah blah blah¦ None of these features are so earth shattering I would pay $299 for the upgrade.&#8221;  The most interesting (yet unsurprising) thing about your screed is that not ONCE do you ever mention what kind of features you&#8217;re looking for which *would* make the insignificantly small $299 upgrade price &#8220;worth it&#8221; to you.</p>
<p>As it stands, this article is Not Worth the electrons required to display it on one&#8217;s computer screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digital dream/films</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156584</link>
		<dc:creator>digital dream/films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156584</guid>
		<description>well there is some truth to everything that was said here&gt;

The only thing I think they have to do ......it&#039;s speed up the render...it&#039;s REAL slow....
I hope SL does something.to help it (fcs3)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well there is some truth to everything that was said here&gt;</p>
<p>The only thing I think they have to do &#8230;&#8230;it&#8217;s speed up the render&#8230;it&#8217;s REAL slow&#8230;.<br />
I hope SL does something.to help it (fcs3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theguycalledtom</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156579</link>
		<dc:creator>theguycalledtom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156579</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t upgrade then!  It doesn&#039;t seem like you need any of the new features.  Your current version seems to be doing the job fine.

Rejoice in the fact that they have dropped the upgrade price way down, even if you have an older version than FCS2.  When FCS4 comes out, you&#039;ll be able to get the latest version for a much cheaper price!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t upgrade then!  It doesn&#8217;t seem like you need any of the new features.  Your current version seems to be doing the job fine.</p>
<p>Rejoice in the fact that they have dropped the upgrade price way down, even if you have an older version than FCS2.  When FCS4 comes out, you&#8217;ll be able to get the latest version for a much cheaper price!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ryan</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156576</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156576</guid>
		<description>I am a frequent user of all the Final Cut apps and have been for years. I never said these were bad apps, I love them. That being said, every Final Cut user has their quips, and there is definitely room for improvement in all of these apps. 

I&#039;m generally working with shorter news packages, so I don&#039;t feel the need for iChat theater, and so the colorable tabs and a number of other additions don&#039;t do much for my use. I know a number of colleges and news stations that use FCP for their news packages, and in most newsrooms iChat theater can be useful, but its just as easy to walk into an editing bay and look over a package.

I also did say I hadn&#039;t gotten my hands on it. The point was that there aren&#039;t enough tangible features to justify such significant version jumps. I&#039;m not looking for a re-write, or earth shattering features with every new release, but to justify upgrading an entire lab full of machines, I need some incentive. Apple didn&#039;t market it well on their site in my opinion. When I get into an apple store and get my hands on it, I&#039;m hoping to be more impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a frequent user of all the Final Cut apps and have been for years. I never said these were bad apps, I love them. That being said, every Final Cut user has their quips, and there is definitely room for improvement in all of these apps. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m generally working with shorter news packages, so I don&#8217;t feel the need for iChat theater, and so the colorable tabs and a number of other additions don&#8217;t do much for my use. I know a number of colleges and news stations that use FCP for their news packages, and in most newsrooms iChat theater can be useful, but its just as easy to walk into an editing bay and look over a package.</p>
<p>I also did say I hadn&#8217;t gotten my hands on it. The point was that there aren&#8217;t enough tangible features to justify such significant version jumps. I&#8217;m not looking for a re-write, or earth shattering features with every new release, but to justify upgrading an entire lab full of machines, I need some incentive. Apple didn&#8217;t market it well on their site in my opinion. When I get into an apple store and get my hands on it, I&#8217;m hoping to be more impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ruck</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156574</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ruck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156574</guid>
		<description>First, I&#039;m still using 5.4.  Not proud of that, but it gets me through and then some.  I LOVE FCP.  I&#039;ve had my PowerMac G5 twin 2.0 for almost 5 years and haven&#039;t had a single issue.  It&#039;s time I get an intel-based machine.  I don&#039;t know how anyone can write an article about an upgrade they have never used??  WTF?
Sounds to me like the workflow and background rendering is worth it well enough.  I&#039;m not editing on RED (yet) but I plan to and this sounds like the revision to the software that many were hoping for.

I&#039;m excited to get this setup.  I&#039;m sure it&#039;s great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I&#8217;m still using 5.4.  Not proud of that, but it gets me through and then some.  I LOVE FCP.  I&#8217;ve had my PowerMac G5 twin 2.0 for almost 5 years and haven&#8217;t had a single issue.  It&#8217;s time I get an intel-based machine.  I don&#8217;t know how anyone can write an article about an upgrade they have never used??  WTF?<br />
Sounds to me like the workflow and background rendering is worth it well enough.  I&#8217;m not editing on RED (yet) but I plan to and this sounds like the revision to the software that many were hoping for.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m excited to get this setup.  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156573</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156573</guid>
		<description>Unless I&#039;m mistaken Motion now has 3D shadows and the like which is a big deal for many people.  A lot of people I know are pretty excited about BluRay authoring (although most grumble about DVD Studio Pro).  For people dealing with clients and doing back and forth the iChat features are cool as well - but clearly not interesting for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless I&#8217;m mistaken Motion now has 3D shadows and the like which is a big deal for many people.  A lot of people I know are pretty excited about BluRay authoring (although most grumble about DVD Studio Pro).  For people dealing with clients and doing back and forth the iChat features are cool as well &#8211; but clearly not interesting for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Cajiao</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156572</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Cajiao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156572</guid>
		<description>I also disagree as per the points made above. One more thing... I paid $350.00 just to have audio software that would do true RMS leveling. That feature alone is worth half the price of the upgrade. I don&#039;t have it yet, but it&#039;s high on my list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also disagree as per the points made above. One more thing&#8230; I paid $350.00 just to have audio software that would do true RMS leveling. That feature alone is worth half the price of the upgrade. I don&#8217;t have it yet, but it&#8217;s high on my list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonah Lee Walker</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156571</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonah Lee Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156571</guid>
		<description>Wow, I have to totally disagree with this article. As a professional video editor FCPS 3 has many new features that make it an essential upgrade for me. And there seems to have been absolutely no research done as to the new features of FCPS 3, as the talking about DVD Studio Pro and Blu-ray shows.

DVD Studio Pro has not been updated, and has no blu-ray support, but there is now blu-ray support built into both Final Cut Pro and Compressor using some pre-existing templates, and you can burn Blu-ray material on a standard dvd for playback in a blu-ray player.

As the other commentator said, iChat theater is a huge addition, especially for any editor who is working remotely or has a client that is far away. This alone would be worth the upgrade. 

Improved markers with ripple delete and colorable tabs make working with large projects much easier.

Improved speed change support is another essential feature I will use every day, as it&#039;s ability to easily transfer those keyframes to motion to do better slow motion (though I wish this was integrated into Final Cut Pro itself).

The floating timecode window is another feature that will make my ever day life better while editing.

Global transitions also will make my life easier every single day.

With Color, the addition of 4K support is a huge feature, especially for this working with RED.

And with the price drop this upgrade has gotten even more affordable and useful. As a full time editor these new features alone will make every day easier, and more efficient, and that alone makes this an essential upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I have to totally disagree with this article. As a professional video editor FCPS 3 has many new features that make it an essential upgrade for me. And there seems to have been absolutely no research done as to the new features of FCPS 3, as the talking about DVD Studio Pro and Blu-ray shows.</p>
<p>DVD Studio Pro has not been updated, and has no blu-ray support, but there is now blu-ray support built into both Final Cut Pro and Compressor using some pre-existing templates, and you can burn Blu-ray material on a standard dvd for playback in a blu-ray player.</p>
<p>As the other commentator said, iChat theater is a huge addition, especially for any editor who is working remotely or has a client that is far away. This alone would be worth the upgrade. </p>
<p>Improved markers with ripple delete and colorable tabs make working with large projects much easier.</p>
<p>Improved speed change support is another essential feature I will use every day, as it&#8217;s ability to easily transfer those keyframes to motion to do better slow motion (though I wish this was integrated into Final Cut Pro itself).</p>
<p>The floating timecode window is another feature that will make my ever day life better while editing.</p>
<p>Global transitions also will make my life easier every single day.</p>
<p>With Color, the addition of 4K support is a huge feature, especially for this working with RED.</p>
<p>And with the price drop this upgrade has gotten even more affordable and useful. As a full time editor these new features alone will make every day easier, and more efficient, and that alone makes this an essential upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156570</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156570</guid>
		<description>Woah, thats a lot of anger from your previous commentor.  I saw a product demo for FCS 3 last night, and was unimpressed.  I didn&#039;t see a lot different from FCS 2.  The ichat feature is of little use to me.  Red cameras are great but I don&#039;t use them. The exporting features are nice, but they don&#039;t exactley get me excited.

I started editing on Avid 10 years ago, and am now using FC.  What amazes me is that after 10 years, more ram, faster processors, render times are still so slow.  Maybe Apple could do something to dramatically improve that.  How about making the interface in some of their apps a bit more intuitive?  If they could do that, then Ã&#039;d be impressed.  

I saw a number of slightly gimmicky features at the product demo last night, as well as, other features that I could see would be of benefit to others.  But for me not a lot.  Make the software easier to use, make it work faster.  Keep the quality high.  Get the basics right.  

I&#039;m not too proud to ask for these things, and I&#039;ve been at this for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah, thats a lot of anger from your previous commentor.  I saw a product demo for FCS 3 last night, and was unimpressed.  I didn&#8217;t see a lot different from FCS 2.  The ichat feature is of little use to me.  Red cameras are great but I don&#8217;t use them. The exporting features are nice, but they don&#8217;t exactley get me excited.</p>
<p>I started editing on Avid 10 years ago, and am now using FC.  What amazes me is that after 10 years, more ram, faster processors, render times are still so slow.  Maybe Apple could do something to dramatically improve that.  How about making the interface in some of their apps a bit more intuitive?  If they could do that, then Ã&#8217;d be impressed.  </p>
<p>I saw a number of slightly gimmicky features at the product demo last night, as well as, other features that I could see would be of benefit to others.  But for me not a lot.  Make the software easier to use, make it work faster.  Keep the quality high.  Get the basics right.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not too proud to ask for these things, and I&#8217;ve been at this for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Peregrine</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156569</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Peregrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156569</guid>
		<description>The new features and improvements in FCP 7 alone make this upgrade a steal.  Many plugin packages cost more and offer none of the basic creative and time-saving improvements this update does.  Any editor making their living in FCP concerned that this a less-than-exciting update should watch the free tutorials at ripple training, especially the improvements in the speed tools, blu-ray support, and the new codecs.  While overdue, some of the new abilities are very well implemented and answer a lot of the most basic weaknesses of the application.  I can&#039;t wait for my package to arrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new features and improvements in FCP 7 alone make this upgrade a steal.  Many plugin packages cost more and offer none of the basic creative and time-saving improvements this update does.  Any editor making their living in FCP concerned that this a less-than-exciting update should watch the free tutorials at ripple training, especially the improvements in the speed tools, blu-ray support, and the new codecs.  While overdue, some of the new abilities are very well implemented and answer a lot of the most basic weaknesses of the application.  I can&#8217;t wait for my package to arrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156568</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156568</guid>
		<description>This article was probably one of the worst I&#039;ve seen on MacApper in a while. It&#039;s trivial, superficial, and very poorly written. You clearly aren&#039;t professional video editors or regular Final Cut users; at least you&#039;ve admitted that you haven&#039;t even used FCS3 yet.

I&#039;ve been using Studio 3 for a week, and have used Final Cut Pro for years before this. The $300 upgrade cost is perfectly justified and reasonable, for two main reasons.

1. iChat Theater. Thanks to this new feature, my production company can demo a video to a client without any hassle, exporting, or sharing - just open iChat and start playing the Final Cut timeline. This will probably *save* us money in the end, since we had been looking into file sharing services with enough storage and bandwidth to accommodate large and frequent video files.

2. New Exporting Features. It renders in the background. Anyone who&#039;s ever exported a video out of Final Cut can attest to the long wait times and inability to do anything else in the application while waiting for the export to complete: thus, usable time (and therefore money) are lost. If for any reason I have to export what I&#039;m working on and send it to someone else, I don&#039;t have to take a break for an hour or more (depending on the length and size of the video).

Professional video editors are currently rejoicing over the new ProRes codecs, especially those who use RED cameras. Color has seen some necessary and worthwhile upgrades, as has Motion.

Clearly, the consumer writing this article expects every release of Final Cut Studio to be something so revolutionary that it blows everyone away. What can Apple add to the application to make it revolutionary? A new UI for Final Cut Pro, maybe? You can pay for the lost time as professional editors with deadlines have to waste time unlearning the interface they&#039;ve used for years and trying to learn something that may look a little big more Mac-like but doesn&#039;t offer them any more features.

Don&#039;t make criticisms on anything unless you have the proper authority to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was probably one of the worst I&#8217;ve seen on MacApper in a while. It&#8217;s trivial, superficial, and very poorly written. You clearly aren&#8217;t professional video editors or regular Final Cut users; at least you&#8217;ve admitted that you haven&#8217;t even used FCS3 yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using Studio 3 for a week, and have used Final Cut Pro for years before this. The $300 upgrade cost is perfectly justified and reasonable, for two main reasons.</p>
<p>1. iChat Theater. Thanks to this new feature, my production company can demo a video to a client without any hassle, exporting, or sharing &#8211; just open iChat and start playing the Final Cut timeline. This will probably *save* us money in the end, since we had been looking into file sharing services with enough storage and bandwidth to accommodate large and frequent video files.</p>
<p>2. New Exporting Features. It renders in the background. Anyone who&#8217;s ever exported a video out of Final Cut can attest to the long wait times and inability to do anything else in the application while waiting for the export to complete: thus, usable time (and therefore money) are lost. If for any reason I have to export what I&#8217;m working on and send it to someone else, I don&#8217;t have to take a break for an hour or more (depending on the length and size of the video).</p>
<p>Professional video editors are currently rejoicing over the new ProRes codecs, especially those who use RED cameras. Color has seen some necessary and worthwhile upgrades, as has Motion.</p>
<p>Clearly, the consumer writing this article expects every release of Final Cut Studio to be something so revolutionary that it blows everyone away. What can Apple add to the application to make it revolutionary? A new UI for Final Cut Pro, maybe? You can pay for the lost time as professional editors with deadlines have to waste time unlearning the interface they&#8217;ve used for years and trying to learn something that may look a little big more Mac-like but doesn&#8217;t offer them any more features.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t make criticisms on anything unless you have the proper authority to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Thomas</title>
		<link>http://macapper.com/2009/07/30/opinion-new-final-cut-studio-not-worth-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-156565</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macapper.com/?p=9109#comment-156565</guid>
		<description>I just spoke to Apple about this as I only bought Final Cut Studio 2, 3 months ago. I think it&#039;s a ridiculous price for the upgrade, it&#039;s also £70 cheaper in the US than the UK. Thanks Apple. 

I called and had a chat with the very friendly sales person who informs me that Apple offer no rebate whatsoever to customers who recently bought the software (except in the last two weeks...) and that there is no where to register a complaint about them as an organisation. 

I am at a loss to understand how a company can charge so much for such a basic upgrade, the software is great but the company who make it are pirates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spoke to Apple about this as I only bought Final Cut Studio 2, 3 months ago. I think it&#8217;s a ridiculous price for the upgrade, it&#8217;s also £70 cheaper in the US than the UK. Thanks Apple. </p>
<p>I called and had a chat with the very friendly sales person who informs me that Apple offer no rebate whatsoever to customers who recently bought the software (except in the last two weeks&#8230;) and that there is no where to register a complaint about them as an organisation. </p>
<p>I am at a loss to understand how a company can charge so much for such a basic upgrade, the software is great but the company who make it are pirates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

