http://www.bmw-eba.de.tl
http://www.iphonee3gs.com
http://www.ohnezinsen.de.tl

http://www.anysim.net

Thank u Anysim Team for fast Support.

Did everybody now when the update ios 4.3 for iphone4 comes?

Ligers are, after all, the most powerful magical beasts.

The OS names on cats has followed a hierarchy. Each of the cat has certain advantage over the previous one. Like leopard can climb trees and tigers cant. and snow leopard is more adaptable to its environment and this more ‘refined’ than the leopard as it can survive even harsher conditions.

The Lion is the only big cat which is social giving it the ultimate edge over all other cats…even the Largest of them all, the Tiger. Thats what makes it the King of wilderness. It shouldn’t be a surprise if the last of the OS X series is a Lion or Leo.

@ WetcoastBob. Dogs are more adaptable and sucessfull that cats. they bonded with the best in the evolutionary race, Humans, and guaranteed their success as a species way beyond the cats. And btw, who is going extinct?

Cats do not suffer fools! Period! Hopefully neither do Mac users.

Cats cut through the B*** Sh**! So do Mac OS’s.

Cats are independent and go their own way. So does the Mac OS.

Cats are very economical in their movements. Only the minimum exertion is used to accomplish a goal. So does the Mac OS.

Cats move without disturbing anything… they just do their job. Like the Mac OS.

Contrast this with Windows being a big stupid dog blundering into everything and getting nothing done.

Windows Rotwieler
Windows German Shepherd
Windows Bichon Friese
Windows Mutt … maybe the best bet?

Daniel, I get that this piece is only a fun Opinion piece and not meant to carry a lot of facts in it, but the statement above is pretty far off from reality.

Microsoft:
DOS 1.0, DOS 2.0, DOS 2.1x, DOS 3.0, DOS 3.1x (end of DOS product line)
Windows 1.0, Windows 2.0, Windows/286 2.10, Windows/386 2.10, Windows 3.0, Windows 3.1*, Windows 95, Windows 98 (followed by Windows 98 Second Edition in May 1999), Windows ME**
* (Product line split here with the business line as follows) Windows for Workgroups 3.1, Windows NT 3.1, Windows for Workgroups 3.11, Windows NT 3.5, Windows NT 4.0, Windows 2000 (various versions)**, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008
** (The two lines, consumer and business, converged again here, except for mid-release updates to the server version) Windows XP (various versions), Windows Vista (various version), Windows 7 (various versions).
[Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_Windows_versions

You can see that Microsoft hasn't always named their OSs after the approximate year they were released.

As far as Linux ... you've got to know that there are many many distros of Linux. Not sure how you're going to knock Linux as an entire group since it can't be considered a single Mac OS competitor, but if you're wondering if there are any distros which have animal naming systems I suggest looking at Ubuntu (a fork of the Debian distribution). I love the Animal Alliteration.
Ubuntu:
4.10 Warty Warthog, 5.04 Hoary Hedgehog, 5.10 Breezy Badger, 6.06 Dapper Drake, 6.10 Edgy Eft, 7.04 Feisty Fawn, 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon, 8.04 Hardy Heron, 8.10 Intrepid Ibex, 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope, 9.10 Karmic Koala (not yet released)
[Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(operating_system)

If you want to try to wrap your head around the complexity of Linux distros, just take a gander at this distro timeline:
http://bit.ly/linux_distro_timeline

Finally, if you're going to knock Microsoft for the three or so releases that used a year to designate their OS name, you should consider looking at the long history of Apple using decimal names for their OS releases prior to Mac OS X (insert cat breed here).
Apple:
Mac System Software 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, System 5, System 6, System 7, Mac OS 7.6, Mac OS 8, Mac OS 9.
[Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Mac_OS

Then again, all these facts don't really make for a very easy-to-read opinion piece, so I can understand glossing over them.

[Wow, this message reads a lot more snarky than was intended.]

I’m with you on this one, but you’re gonna have to take it up with Disney.

The male doesn’t do the hunting, the hunting is always sneak attacks never in your face, and the attack is an ankle tap causing the animal to fall.

Tigers are way more powerful, way bigger, and fearless. I’ve seen a video where a tiger took out the people sitting atop of an elephant.

Lions wouldn’t even go near an elephant and they stay well away from giraffes. Nope, lions are the king of the wusses.

10.7 Lynx
10.8 Cougar
10.9 Tabby

This makes me wonder what naming scheme they’ll use for the eventually inevitable Mac OS XI…

Cheetah 10.0
Puma 10.1
Jaguar 10.2
Panther 10.3
Tiger 10.4
Leopard 10.5
and now Snow Leopard 10.6

Saber Tooth is a bad choice sinces it’s extinct and prehistoric, two things Apple wouldn’t want to associate with its OS.

@pato… I’m assuming you meant Sabre Tooth Tiger?

If that ain’t enough Caracal, Serval, Bobcat, Ocelot, Kodkod, Margay are other wild cats..

Rest easy